April 2008

     Senior Federal Judge L.T. Senter, Jr. of the Southern District of Mississippi has come full circle in his analysis of the anti-concurrent cause provision in home-owner’s policies.  Judge Senter has been in the trenches, handling many of the initial Katrina insurance related cases at the trial court level.  In some of Judge Senter’s

At stake in Gillan v. Government Employees Insurance Co., No. 28075 (Haw. Ct. App. April 17, 2008), was whether the insurer could deny Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits based upon a review of medical records by a doctor chosen by the insurer but without the insured’s approval.

Gillian was injured in an accident while

Although it did not address insurance coverage, the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) issued an important decision regarding the state’s regulation of the insurance industry in Hawaii Insurers Council v. Lingle, et al, No. 27840 (Haw. Ct. App. April 14, 2008).

The Insurance Regulation Fund (IRF) was established by the legislature in 1999,

Insurers continued an impressive record of securing reversals on appeal from adverse coverage decisions in Katrina related litigation.  The two latest cases were issued on  consecutive days, one by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Broussard v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., No. 07-60443 (5th Cir. April 7, 2008) and the other by

What makes for a more interesting insurance case than a fight between surviving members of the Doors leading to a coverage dispute over the duty to defend?  Applying California case law, which is very similar to Hawaii case law, the Ninth Circuit recently determined St. Paul had a duty to defend a surviving of the