A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment finding there was no coverage for an employee’s injury due to the policy’s Workers’ Compensation exclusion. Houston Spec. Ins. Co. v. Villanueva, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 255989 (E.D. Wash. Dec. 10, 2025).
Heavy Metal Carports Inc. (HMC) secured a policy from Houston Specialty…
The appellate court affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the contractor’s insurer finding that the sumcontractor’s insurer had a duty to defend the contractor. Navigators Specialty Ins. Co. v. TBR Construction, LLC, et al., 2025 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2177 (Ill. Ct. App. Dec. 3, 2025).
Greenscape Homes, LLC was the…
The court granted partial summary judgment on the duty to defend to two additional insureds who were named as defendants in the underlying personal injury suit. In re Third St. Equity, LLC, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234909 (E.D. N. Y. Dec. 2, 2025).
Third Street Equity LLD hired Developing NY State, LLC as…
The court determined that the subcontractor’s insurer owed a defense to the additional insured general contractor in a bodily injury suit. Charter Oak Fire Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227712 (S.D. W. V. Nov. 19, 2025).
A.L.L. Construction, Inc. was the general contractor for a construction project.
The court found that the insurer had a duty to defend and dismissed the insurer’s motion for summary judgment. Travelers Indem. Co. of Conn. v. I.C. Refrigeration Services Inc., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221768 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2025).
Flory Construction, Inc. sued the project owner, Highbridge, asserting claims for (1) foreclosure on mechanics…
The court dismissed the additional insured’s complaint seeking a defense against a personal injury case. Piece Mgmt., Inc. v. Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205589 (S.D. N. Y. Oct. 18, 2025).
The underlying plaintiff, Mustafaa Dais alleged that he was injured when a glass door collapsed onto him as he exited…
In a dispute between two insurers regarding which had a duty to defend in the underlying lawsuit, the federal district court denied one insurer's motion to join the underlying plaintiff as a necessary party. Amerisure Ins. Co. v. Burlington Ins. Group, Inc., 2025 U.S. Distl LEXIS 144927 (N.D. Ill. July 29, 2025). …
The court denied the insurer's motion for summary judgment on its claim that a defense was not owed to an entity not named as the insured under the policy. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. Order Denying Rip Van 898, LLC, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139269 (D. Nev. July 22, 2025).
…
The federal district court determined that the insurer must defend the additional insured even though it was premature to determine whether there was also a duty to indemnify. Liberty Mutual. Fire Ins. Co. v. Acuity Mut. Inx. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121429 (D. Nev. June 26, 2025).
Royal…
The court agreed with Travelers that Lloyd's had a duty to defend the underlying personal injury case. Travelers Indem. Co. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118445 (S.D. N. Y. June 23, 2025).
Jerome Avenue owned a multi-tenant property in the Bronx, New York. Jerome Avenue leased…
