The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment finding there was no coverage for an employee’s injury due to the policy’s Workers’ Compensation exclusion. Houston Spec. Ins. Co. v. Villanueva, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 255989 (E.D. Wash. Dec. 10, 2025).

Heavy Metal Carports Inc. (HMC) secured a policy from Houston Specialty

    The court reversed dismissal of all claims against the insurers for a work-related death after determining that policy exclusions conflicted with statutory mandates on coverage. Waiau, et al. v. Hawaii Employers' Mut. Ins. Co,  Inc., et al., 2024 Haw. App, LEXIS 583 (Haw. Ct. App., Dec. 31, 2014).

    Amos K.

    The Ninth Circuit, applying Oregon law, limited the scope of the insuring agreement for "damages because of 'bodily injury'" and found there was no duty to defend. Bliss Sequoia Ins. & Risk Advisors, Inc. v. Allied Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 29905 (9th Cir. Oct. 27, 2022). 

 

    The South Carolina Supreme Court held that a post-loss assignment of rights under the policy was valid even though consent of the insurer was not requested. PCS Nitrogen, Inc. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 2022 S.C. LEIXS 54 (S.C. April 13, 2022).

    In 1966, Columbia Nitrogen Corporation (Old CNC) began operating