The court found that the insurer had a duty to defend and dismissed the insurer’s motion for summary judgment. Travelers Indem. Co. of Conn. v. I.C. Refrigeration Services Inc., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221768 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2025).
Flory Construction, Inc. sued the project owner, Highbridge, asserting claims for (1) foreclosure on mechanics
The Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s determination that an insurer who altered its initial determination of coverage was equitably estopped from doing so. Penn-Star Ins. Co. v. Dongbu Ins. Co., Ltd., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 27904 (2nd Cir. Oct. 24, 2025).
J.G.F. NY leased space from 89th Jamaica. S&H Fish Co. was a
The lower court’s decision granting the insurer’s motion to dismiss parties not named as an insured or additional insured was granted. Ocasio v. Metro Myrtle Ave, LLC, 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5925 (N.Y. App, Div. Oct. 22, 2025).
The plaintiff tripped and fell on a sidewalk in front of premises owned by defendants
The court dismissed the additional insured’s complaint seeking a defense against a personal injury case. Piece Mgmt., Inc. v. Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205589 (S.D. N. Y. Oct. 18, 2025).
The underlying plaintiff, Mustafaa Dais alleged that he was injured when a glass door collapsed onto him as he exited
The insurer’s Motion to Compel the production of the insured’s income tax returns was partially successful after the court limited the number of years for which returns would be produced. Pittman Assets MSSC, L.L.C. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182049 (E.D. La. Sept. 17, 2026).
Pittman’s property was insured by Scottsdale
The insurer’s motion to compel documents and communications from another insurer was denied. Ins. Co. of Pa. v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178726 (D. N.J. Sept. 12, 2025).
Jacobs Engineering firm suffered a verdict in state court of $2,579,000.00. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (ICSP) insured Jacobs
The court held the policy’s Employer’s Liability Exclusion precluded coverage for the injured individual who was deemed to be an employee of the insured. Craft v. Access L.L.C., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179794 (W.D. La. Sept. 2, 2025).
Charles Craft worked for FL Crane & Sons, Inc.. The general contractor of the project, Lemoine Company
The Supreme Court of New York granted the insured’s motion to compel the production of underwriting materials related to identifying additional insureds. Church of St. Andrew v. Western World Ins. Co., 2025 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 7018 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Aug. 5, 2025).
The Church of St. Andrew (“church”) retained GC Solutions to perform roofing
The court denied the insurer's motion for summary judgment on its claim that a defense was not owed to an entity not named as the insured under the policy. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. Order Denying Rip Van 898, LLC, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139269 (D. Nev. July 22, 2025).
The federal district court determined that the insurer must defend the additional insured even though it was premature to determine whether there was also a duty to indemnify. Liberty Mutual. Fire Ins. Co. v. Acuity Mut. Inx. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121429 (D. Nev. June 26, 2025).
Royal