The lower court’s decision granting the insurer’s motion to dismiss parties not named as an insured or additional insured was granted. Ocasio v. Metro Myrtle Ave, LLC, 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5925 (N.Y. App, Div. Oct. 22, 2025).
The plaintiff tripped and fell on a sidewalk in front of premises owned by defendants
The insurer’s Motion to Compel the production of the insured’s income tax returns was partially successful after the court limited the number of years for which returns would be produced. Pittman Assets MSSC, L.L.C. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182049 (E.D. La. Sept. 17, 2026).
Pittman’s property was insured by Scottsdale
The insurer’s motion to compel documents and communications from another insurer was denied. Ins. Co. of Pa. v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178726 (D. N.J. Sept. 12, 2025).
Jacobs Engineering firm suffered a verdict in state court of $2,579,000.00. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (ICSP) insured Jacobs
The Supreme Court of New York granted the insured’s motion to compel the production of underwriting materials related to identifying additional insureds. Church of St. Andrew v. Western World Ins. Co., 2025 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 7018 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Aug. 5, 2025).
The Church of St. Andrew (“church”) retained GC Solutions to perform roofing
The court denied the insurer's motion to compel an inspection of the insured's residential rental property and the insurer's request for attorney fees. Bradley v. Evanston Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14522 (E.D. La. Jan. 27, 2025).
Plaintiff suffered damage to her property due to Hurricane Ida. Evanston insured
The special master granted the insured's motion to compel the deposition of the in-house counsel who had acted as a claims handler. Wolverine World Wide, Inc. v. The American Insurance Co., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225007 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 1, 2023).
The insured, Wolverine, moved compel the fact deposition of
The court overruled the objection to the magistrate issuance of a protective order to prevent a deposition related to a dismissed claim. Pulte Home Corp. v. TIG Ins. Co., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159014 (S.D. Calif. Aug 23, 2021).
Plaintiff was the general contractor for two real estate development projects.
The Texas Supreme Court ordered that a Rule 30 (b) (6) deposition could go forward with appropriate limitations. In re USAA Gen. Indem. Co., 2021 Tex. LEXIS 540 (Tex. June 18, 2021).
Frank Wearden was insured under a automobile policy issued by USAA. Wearden was involved in a car accident
The plaintiff's failure to timely name an expert witness in his bad faith action led to sanctions being awarded against him in favor of the insurer. Black v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 2020 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2477 (Cal. Ct. App. April 23, 2020).
After Black's claim was denied by
The Fourth Circuit certified the following question to the South Carolina Supreme Court: Does South Carolina law support application of the "at issue" exception to the attorney-client privilege such that a party may waive the privilege by denying liability in its answer? In Re: Mt. Hawley Ins. Co., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS