January 2009

    Our blog has been added to Alltop (http://insurance.alltop.com/), a site featuring many insurance-related blogs nationwide.  For each blog, Alltop lists several of the most current posts.  So you can now log onto Alltop, visit insurancelawhawaii.com, and then check what is offered on other insurance-related sites.

    Thanks to Alltop for including our blog.

Featured in Alltop

    A case decided by the Illinois Supreme Court demonstrates how crucial the burden of proof is in determining coverage issues.  The court determined two closely related deaths constituted two occurrences under the insured landowner's comprehensive liability policy.  See Addison Ins. Co. v. Fay, No. 105752 (Ill. Sup. Ct. Jan. 23, 2009).  Accordingly, the policy's aggregate limit was applicable.

    A prior post addressed Dickerson v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26504 (5th Cir. Dec. 22, 2008), wherein the Fifth Circuit reversed its trend by issuing a Katrina-related decision in favor of the policy-holder.  The Fifth Circuit recently upheld another decision in favor of policy-holders after Hurricane Katrina destroyed their home.  See  Grilletta

    In one of the major Hurricane Katrina-related decisions, In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation, 495 F.3d 191 (5th Cir. 2007), the Fifth Circuit overturned the district court’s decision that flood exclusion is ambiguous.  Hundreds of claims are still being litigated in the district court where an order was recently entered dismissing duplicate claims.  See In

    The California Court of Appeal recently issued an important case involving coverage for continuous property damage over several policy periods.  Among its various rulings, the court held policy limits of multiple policies could be stacked.  Further, the "all sums" rule, obligating each insurer to pay the entire claim, was applicable.  See State of California v.

    I was recently asked to look into investment and disclosure requirements for health insurance companies authorized to issue policies in Hawaii.  A summary follows:

    Hawaii Law

    Investment requirements for all insurance companies are addressed in the Article VI of the Hawaii Insurance Code, Haw. Rev. Stat. §431:6-101-6-602.  Generally, any security or other investment purchased by an insurer

    Last April we reviewed the Hawai`i Intermediate Court of Appeals' (ICA) decision that the Insurance Commissioner's assessments against insurers were unconstitutional taxes.  The Hawai`i Supreme Court recently affirmed in part, reversed in part.  See  Hawaii Insurers Council v. Lingle, 2008 Haw. LEXIS 287 (Haw. Dec. 18, 2008).

    In 1999, the legislature created the Insurance

    Although the insurer's conduct did not amount to bad faith in Young v. Allstate Ins. Co., 119 Haw. 403 (Haw. 2008), the court held plaintiff's allegations of intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) were sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss.

    Plaintiff alleged she was stopped in traffic when a car operated by an