2009

    The ABA, Section of Litigation, Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee, will be conducting its annual insurance seminar in Tucson, Arizona on March 4-7, 2009.  This very informative, cutting edge seminar covers a number of insurance related topics.  The brochure and agenda are attached here.  I will be participating on a panel entitled, "Transfer of Coverage Under the

    If the manufacturer sells its asbestos-containing product without a warning, does this constitute one occurrence?  Or is each individual's exposure to asbestos, which results in injury, a single occurrence?  These were among the issues before the Wisconsin Supreme Court when faced with certified questions from the Seventh Circuit.  See Plastics Engineering Co. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., No. 2008AP333-CQ (Wis. Jan. 29

    In a recent post, we discussed Dickerson v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26504 (5th Cir. Dec. 22, 2008) where the Fifth Circuit determined damages for mental anguish were properly granted based on the insurer's bad faith delay in paying a claim after Hurricane Katrina.  Dickerson controlled a subsequent decision by

    Our blog has been added to Alltop (http://insurance.alltop.com/), a site featuring many insurance-related blogs nationwide.  For each blog, Alltop lists several of the most current posts.  So you can now log onto Alltop, visit insurancelawhawaii.com, and then check what is offered on other insurance-related sites.

    Thanks to Alltop for including our blog.

Featured in Alltop

    A case decided by the Illinois Supreme Court demonstrates how crucial the burden of proof is in determining coverage issues.  The court determined two closely related deaths constituted two occurrences under the insured landowner's comprehensive liability policy.  See Addison Ins. Co. v. Fay, No. 105752 (Ill. Sup. Ct. Jan. 23, 2009).  Accordingly, the policy's aggregate limit was applicable.

    A prior post addressed Dickerson v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26504 (5th Cir. Dec. 22, 2008), wherein the Fifth Circuit reversed its trend by issuing a Katrina-related decision in favor of the policy-holder.  The Fifth Circuit recently upheld another decision in favor of policy-holders after Hurricane Katrina destroyed their home.  See  Grilletta

    In one of the major Hurricane Katrina-related decisions, In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation, 495 F.3d 191 (5th Cir. 2007), the Fifth Circuit overturned the district court’s decision that flood exclusion is ambiguous.  Hundreds of claims are still being litigated in the district court where an order was recently entered dismissing duplicate claims.  See In

    The California Court of Appeal recently issued an important case involving coverage for continuous property damage over several policy periods.  Among its various rulings, the court held policy limits of multiple policies could be stacked.  Further, the "all sums" rule, obligating each insurer to pay the entire claim, was applicable.  See State of California v.