2023

    The insured's claim failed to fall within coverage under the cyber policy. Ford L.L.C. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2023 U.S Dist. LEXIS 177426 (W.D. La. Oct. 2. 2023).

    The insured, Benoit Ford, LLC and Benoit Nissan, LLC, sought coverage under their cyber policy after the theft of vehicles. Benoit owned

    The Court held that the insurer defending the additional insured general contractor had no right to equitable subrogation or equitable contribution from a separate carrier who also insured the general contractor as an additional insured. Old Republic Gen. Ins. Co. v. Amerisure Ins. Co., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170293 (N.D. Ill. Sept.

    The trial court's order granting the insured's motion to stay litigation and compel an appraisal was affirmed even though the insurer had not determined coverage on the insured's additional claims.Heritage Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Wellington Place HOA, 2023 Fla. App. LEXIS 6405 (Fla. Ct. App. Sept. 13, 2023).

 

    The insured's COVID-19 claim was dismissed under one policy, but survived a motion to dismiss under a second Restaurant Recovery Policy. Menchies Group, inc. v. Mass Bay Ins Co., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153933 (S.D. N.Y. Aug. 31, 2023). 

    Menchies owned and operated frozen yogurt shops throughout the United States.