Here is our power point from today's presentation to the Hawaii State Bar Association's Litigation and Insurance Coverage Litigation sections. We discussed "other insurance" clauses as addressed by the Hawaii Supreme Court in Nautilus Ins. Co. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 132 Haw. 283, 321 P.3d 634 (2014).
“Other Insurance” Clauses to Be Discussed at Hawaii Bar Association Meeting
On July 22, 2014, Richard Moser (Anderson Kill), Joseph Kotowski (Tom Petrus & Miller) and I (Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert) will make a joint presentation to the Litigation and Insurance Coverage Litigation sections of the Hawaii State Bar Association. We will discuss a recent decision issued by the Hawaii Supreme Court, Nautilus Ins.
Excess Policy Triggered Once Retention Paid, Even if Loss Not Covered By Excess
The Fifth Circuit determined that the Umbrella policies took effect once the primary insurance was exhausted by claims not covered by the Umbrella policies. Indem. Ins. Co. of N. Am. v. W&T Offshore, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 11775 (5th Cir. June 23, 2014).
W&T had primary and Umbrella/Excess coverage to
Property Damage Caused By Construction Next Door Covered as Ensuing Loss
Damage to the insureds' property caused by construction undertaken on the adjacent lot was covered under the insureds' property policy. Chubb Indem. Ins Co. v. 21 E. Cedar, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79906 (N.D. Ill. June 12, 2014).
The insureds' home sustained damage contemporaneous with demolition, excavation, and construction taking place on a
Hawaii Court of Appeals Affirms Broker’s Liability for Failure to Renew Coverage
The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed the jury's finding that the broker was liable for failing to secure coverage for the insureds' home. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Vreeken, 2014 Haw. App. LEXIS 322 (Haw. Ct. App. June 30, 2014).
Based upon their dealings with the broker, the insureds thought
Insurer Must Defend Claims of Sexual Abuse
The district court decision that a defense was owed for claims that included sexual abuse was affirmed by the First Circuit. Metropolitan Property and Cas. Ins. Co. v. McCarthy, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10622 (1st Cir. June 5, 2014).
The insured was sued when one of her wards allegedly sexually and physically abused
No Duty to Defend Suit That Is Threatened Under Strict Liability Statute
The Washington Court of Appeals found there was no duty to defend the insured under a strict liability statute for alleged contamination when no action was threatened by the agency. Gull Indus., Inc. v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 2014 Wash. App. LEXIS 1338 (Wa. Ct. App. June 2, 2014).
Gull leased
Coverage For Advertising Injury Barred by Prior Publication Exclusion
The Ninth Circuit held that a claim for advertising injury was properly denied under the prior publication exclusion. Street Surfing, LLC v. Great Am. E&S Ins. Co., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10737 (9th Cir. June 10, 2014).
Street Surfing began selling a two-wheeled, inline skateboard called the "Wave" in December 2004. By
Insurer’s Motion in Limine to Dismiss Case for Lack of Expert Denied
The court denied the insurer's motion in limine seeking to dismiss the insureds' complaint due to the absence of expert testimony. Fabozzi v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74069 (E.D. N.Y. May 30, 2014).
During the policy period, the insureds noticed their house had serious structural problems, including cracks in
No Coverage for Installation of Defective Steel Framing
The California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's holding that the insurer had no duty to defend claims arising out of the insureds' installation of defective steel framing in an apartment building. Regional Steel Corp. v. Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp., No. B245961(Cal. Ct. App. May 16, 2014) [decision here].
Regional