The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals overruled the trial court's award of summary judgment to Hawaii Medical Service Association ("HMSA") on bad faith and emotional distress claims, and remanded the case for further proceedings. Adams v. Hawaii Medical Serv. Ass'n., No. 30314, Summary Disposition Order (Haw. Ct. App. Sept. 30, 2013) [here

   Having previously decided that construction defect claims did not arise from an occurrence and were consequently not covered under Hawaii law, the Hawaii Federal District Court refused to dismiss the insured's second amended counterclaim alleging various claims for relief. Ill. Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Nordic PCL Construc., Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108932

   The Texas Supreme Court considered whether communications between the insurer's lawyer and the employer of the injured employee were privileged. See In Re XL Spec. Ins. Co., 2012 Tex. LEXIS 568 (Tex. June 20, 2011).

   XL was Cintas Corporation's workers' compensation carrier. XL's policy required Cintas to cooperate in the investigation, settlement and

   The Seventh Circuit predicted that the Wisconsin Supreme Court would adopt the continuous injury trigger for first party property loss that extends over several policy periods. Miller v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 12940 (7th Cir. June 25, 2012).

   A home inspection report performed before the Millers purchased

   My Damon Key blogging colleague, Rebecca Copeland at www.Recordonappeal.com., reports here that the Hawaii Supreme Court accepted certiorari in Willis v.Swain, First Insurance Company of Hawaii, Ltd., No. SCWC-29539. Our post on the Hawaii Intermediate Court decision is here. The case involves whether the insurance company owes a duty of good faith in