A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
Following the jurisprudence set forth by the Hawaii Supreme Court, the Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's rejection of the insured's claim for bad faith. Stewart v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Co., 2012 Haw. Ct. App. LEXIS 148 (Haw. Ct. App. Feb. 10, 2012).
The ICA agreed with the insured that the trial…
Shilo Willis was injured when the uninsured car in which she was a passenger was struck by another vehicle. Willis v. Swain, 2012 Haw. Ct. App. LEXIS 131 (Haw. Ct. App. Feb. 3, 2012). Willis was enrolled under a "certificate policy" which was provided under Hawaii's Joint Underwriting Plan (JUP) to drivers receiving public…
In perhaps its most significant insurance coverage decision since Young v. Allstate, 119 Haw. 403, 198 P.3d 666 (2008), the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled that an insured need not prove economic or physical loss caused by the insurer's bad faith in order to recover emotional distress damages. See Miller v. Hartford Life Ins. Co.…
Landmark American Insurance Company successfully moved to dismiss four of the insured's six counts. Landmark Am Ins. Co. v. Studio Imports, Ltd., Inc., Nos. 4D10-5001 and 4D10-5073 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 16, 2011). The trial court did not dismiss the breach of contract claim and the bad faith claim. Because both claims…
Thanks to all who attended yesterday’s seminar on Insurance Bad Faith Claims in Waikiki, hosted by Sterling Education Services. We had an astute, engaged audience, which made the event a success.
Attached is the Bad Faith Power Point for my topics, Development of the Tort of Bad Faith and Elements of a…
After the trial court determined the insurers had no coverage obligations for alleged construction defects, a ruling that was subsequently reversed, it was still possible to demonstrate the insurers acted in bad faith. See Lennar Corp. v. Transamerica Ins. Co., 2011 Ariz. App. LEXIS 123 (Ariz. Ct. App. July 5, 2011).
Lennar oversaw…
The insured employer adequately pled its claims against the California State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF), allowing it to survive a demurrer. Edward Carey Constr. Co. v. State Compensation Insurance Fund, 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 457 (Cal. Ct. App. March 25, 2011, certified for publication April 20, 2011).
Edward Carey Construction Co. (CCC) had…
The importance of careful preparation and documentation was the take away lesson in a Texas bad faith case, C.K. Lee v. Catlin Specialty Ins. Co., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19145 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 2011).
C.K. Lee owned a commercial shopping center in Houston. Catlin issued a commercial property policy to Lee. …
If the insurer notifies the insured it intends to settle a claim, but will then seek reimbursement if the claim is not covered, can the insured avoid having to reimburse the insurer? The California Court of Appeal answered no in Am. Modern Home Ins. Co. v. Fahmian, 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 420 (Cal.
Can an insured settle a disputed claim with its first party insurer and then sue the insurer for allegedly fraudulently inducing a settlement of the claim for less than it is worth? The California Supreme Court answered no in Village Northridge Homeowners Assoc. v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 2010 Cal. LEXIS…
