A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
The Illinois Court of Appeals determined the insurer must defend allegations of property damage arising from faulty workmanship. Milwaukee Mut. Ins. Co. v. J.P. Larsen, Inc., 2011 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1443 (Ill. Ct. App. June, 20, 2011).
Larsen was a subcontractor for Weather-Tite in a condominium building. Weather-Tite installed windows on the…
The homeowners hired the insured to raise the structure of their home twenty-four inches above the flood zone. Lafayette Ins. Co. v. Peerboom, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58985 (S.D. Miss. June 2, 2011). When the insured's crew returned from lunch one day, they found the house had fallen from hydraulic jacks being used…
The insurer's duty to defend the insured against claims arising from contamination of the commercial rice supply by mixing it with genetically modified ("GM") rice was at stake in Riceland Foods, Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61381 (E.D. Ark. June 8, 2011).
Riceland processed and marketed rice and other…
The case involved another chapter in the long-standing coverage litigation in which the insured, Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, sought to enforce indemnity obligations against its insurers for thousands of suits filed because of asbestos exposure. See Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corp. v. Ins. Co. of the State of Pennsylvania, 2011 Cal. App.
The insurer sought to avoid coverage for claims against its insured, a supplier of Chinese drywall. The court ruled, however that the exclusions relied upon by the insurer did not bar coverage. See Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Am. Building Materials, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52837 (M.D. Fla. May 17, 2011).
The…
KITV reported last week that the Keehi Marine Center, owner of a boat harbor in Honolulu, and its insurer, Travelers, are denying claims for boats moored at the harbor and damaged during the March 11, 2011 tsunami. Liability is being denied because damage to the boats "occurred as a result of the tsunami, an…
The insured's request for a defense when sued in a construction defect action was denied under the owned property exclusion and the alienated property exclusion in 1777 Lafayette Partners v. Golden Gate Ins. Co., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48562 (N.D. Cal. April 29, 2011).
In 1999, Lafayette Partners purchased an abandoned walnut processing…
On May 17, 2011, South Carolina passed legislation to combat the restrictive interpretation of what constitutes an "occurrence" under CGL policies. S.C. Code Ann. sec. 38-61-70.
The legislation reversed a decision by the state's Supreme Court issued earlier this year. See Crossman Communities of North Carolina, Inc. v. Harleysville Mut. Ins. Co., 2011 W.L.
If the insurer notifies the insured it intends to settle a claim, but will then seek reimbursement if the claim is not covered, can the insured avoid having to reimburse the insurer? The California Court of Appeal answered no in Am. Modern Home Ins. Co. v. Fahmian, 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 420 (Cal.
After being sued for failure to secure a policy, the insurance agents sought dismissal of the insured's suit on statute of limitations ground. Kelly v. Lodwick, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4810 (Fla. Ct. App. April 6, 2011).
A private school was notified its policy would not be renewed after it lapsed on…
