Interpreting Missouri law, a federal district court determined that property damage arising from faulty workmanship did not arise from an occurrence. Employers Mut. Casualty Co. v. Luke Draily Constr. Co., 2011 U.S. Dst. LEXIS 69929 (W.D. Mo. June 29, 2011).

   Draily Construction Company was hired as general contractor on a hotel construction

   The homeowners sued their contractor, alleging the contractor had defectively constructed and failed to complete their home.  State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Vogelgesang, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72618 (D. Haw. July 6, 2011).  The homeowners' complaint pled, among other things, damage caused by breach of contract and negligence.  State Farm agreed to

   The Illinois Court of Appeals determined the insurer must defend allegations of property damage arising from faulty workmanship.  Milwaukee Mut. Ins. Co. v. J.P. Larsen, Inc., 2011 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1443 (Ill. Ct. App. June, 20, 2011).

   Larsen was a subcontractor for Weather-Tite in a condominium building.  Weather-Tite installed windows on the

   Since late last week, we have heard rumors that HB 924 was signed by the Governor.  Before today, there was no confirmation of this on either the Legislature's or the Governor's websites. 

   As you recall, HB 924 states that "occurrence" in a liability policy "shall be construed in accordance with the law as it existed

  The insured's request for a defense when sued in a construction defect action was denied under the owned property exclusion and the alienated property exclusion in 1777 Lafayette Partners v. Golden Gate Ins. Co., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48562 (N.D. Cal. April 29, 2011).

   In 1999, Lafayette Partners purchased an abandoned walnut processing

On May 17, 2011, South Carolina passed legislation to combat the restrictive interpretation of what constitutes an "occurrence" under CGL policies. S.C. Code Ann. sec. 38-61-70.

The legislation reversed a decision by the state's Supreme Court issued earlier this year. See Crossman Communities of North Carolina, Inc. v. Harleysville Mut. Ins. Co., 2011 W.L.

   Whether a contractor who failed to complete construction of a home had coverage for alleged construction defects was at issue in Clarendon Am. Ins. Co. v. Gen. Sec. Indem. Co. of Arizona, 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 377 (Cal. Ct. App. March 2, 2011). 

      Hilmor Development contracted with the homeowners to serve as general contractor

   Georgia has joined the growing legion of high state courts to find that faulty workmanship can arise from an occurrence, invoking coverage for a contractor.  See Am. Empire Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v. Hathaway Dev. Co., Inc., 2011 Ga. LEXIS 177 (Ga. March 7, 2011). 

   Hathaway Development Co., a general contractor, sued

   Whether coverage existed for property damage occurring after the subcontract finished its work on the project was the issue presented in United Fire & Cas. Co. v. Boulder Plaza Residential, LLC, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 1694 (Jan. 27, 2011).

   Boulder Plaza Residential, LLC ("BPR"), a real estate developer, and McCrery & Roberts Construction

   This post from today's BusinessInsurance.com addresses legislation introduced in South Carolina seeking to extend coverage for construction defects under CGL policies.  We posted on a similar effort underway in Hawaii to expand coverage for construction defects under SB1194.

   Similar to Hawaii's effort through SB1194 to correct the Intermediate Court of Appeal's decision in