The California Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's dismissal of the insured's COVID-19 claim seeking coverage under communicalbe disease provisions. Amy's Kitchen, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 2022 Cal. App. LEXIS 836 (Oct. 4, 2022).    

    Amy's employed over 2,500 people to manufacture organic and vegetarian meals at facilities

    The Vermont Supreme Court found that the insured's complaint alleging business interruption due to COVID-19 could survive the insurer's motion for judgment on the pleadings. Huntington Ingall's Industries v. Ace Am. Ins. Co., 2022 Vt. LEXIS 47 (Sept. 23, 2022). 

    In March 2020, the Undersecretary of Defense told the insured

    Answering a certified question, the South Carolina Supreme Court determined that the presence of COVID-19 and/or government shutdown orders did not constitute "direct physical loss or damage" to property. Sullivan Mgmt. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 2022 S.C. LEXIS 90 (S.C. Sup. Ct. Aug. 10, 2022).

    Sullivan Management, LLC operated

    After reversing the trial court's denial of the insured's petition for declaratory judgment on a business interruption claim, the Louisiana Court of Appeals denied the insurer's motion for rehearing en banc. Cajun Conti LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, 2022 La. App. LEXIS 1278 (La. Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2022).

   

    The federal district court for the district of Hawaii determined the insured's COVID-19 claims were novel and undecided by Hawaii state courts and remanded the case. Hawaii Theatre Center v. Am. Ins. Co., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152836 (D. Haw. Aug. 25, 2022). 

    The Theatre sought coverage under its commercial

    The federal district court found there were multiple occurrences of property damage under a disease contamination provision in the policy. Dental Express, LLC v. Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119701 (N.D. Ill. July 7, 2022). 

    Dental Express operated seventy-three dental offices across nine states and the District