Claims that an insurance broker misrepresented coverage survived a motion to dismiss in a case decided by the New Jersey federal district court. Danho v. Fidelity Nat. Indemn. Ins. Co., Civil Action No. 2:13-CV-04547 (D. N.J. Sept. 25, 2013). 

   The insured's home was covered under a flood policy issued by and through

   The court determined that the policy's ensuing loss provision prevented the insurer's motion for summary judgment on coverage for repair of an elevator. Lloyd's Acceptance Corp. v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130405 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 12, 2013).

   The insured managed an apartment building with four passenger elevators. After

   The California Supreme Court determined that insurance practices violating the state's Unfair Insurance Practices Act (UIPA) could support a claim under the state's unfair competition law (UCL). Zhang v. Superior Court, 57 Cal. 4th 353 (2013).

   Zhang purchased a CGL policy from California Capital Insurance Company. She sued California Capital in a

   The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals overruled the trial court's award of summary judgment to Hawaii Medical Service Association ("HMSA") on bad faith and emotional distress claims, and remanded the case for further proceedings. Adams v. Hawaii Medical Serv. Ass'n., No. 30314, Summary Disposition Order (Haw. Ct. App. Sept. 30, 2013) [here