The insured moved for summary judgment on bad faith because of the insurer's alleged delayed and incomplete payments after Hurricane Katrina destroyed property.  See Plaquemines Parish School Bd v. Indus. Risk Insurers, No. 06-7213, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20004 (E.D. La. March 11, 2009). 

    School buildings operated by the insured

    In a recent post, we discussed Dickerson v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26504 (5th Cir. Dec. 22, 2008) where the Fifth Circuit determined damages for mental anguish were properly granted based on the insurer's bad faith delay in paying a claim after Hurricane Katrina.  Dickerson controlled a subsequent decision by

    A prior post addressed Dickerson v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26504 (5th Cir. Dec. 22, 2008), wherein the Fifth Circuit reversed its trend by issuing a Katrina-related decision in favor of the policy-holder.  The Fifth Circuit recently upheld another decision in favor of policy-holders after Hurricane Katrina destroyed their home.  See  Grilletta

    In one of the major Hurricane Katrina-related decisions, In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation, 495 F.3d 191 (5th Cir. 2007), the Fifth Circuit overturned the district court’s decision that flood exclusion is ambiguous.  Hundreds of claims are still being litigated in the district court where an order was recently entered dismissing duplicate claims.  See In

    Our post last week (here) discussed Corban v. USAA, a case before Mississippi Supreme Court presenting an opportunity for the court to address the validity of the anti-concurrent causation clause under state law.  Subsequently, slabbed.com, a Mississippi based-blog, put up a post (here) with additional background on the Corban case, including some of

    A case before the Mississippi Supreme Court asks whether the anti-concurrent causation clause in homeowners policies is ambiguous.  See  Corban v. United Services Automobile Association, No. 2008-M-645 (Miss.).  The appeal criticizes and asks the Mississippi court to depart from holdings in the trio of Hurricane Katrina cases decided by the Fifth Circuit:

     Three years after Katrina, Tulane University continues to be mired in litigation seeking coverage under its property policies for damage inflicted by the hurricane.  In Ace American Ins. Co. v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66299 (E.D. La. Aug. 29, 2008), the court decided several coverage issues