A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
While the insured's faulty work constituted an occurrence under Florida law, a prior occurrence exclusion barred coverage. Pro-Tech Caulking & Waterproofing v. TIG Ins. Co., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12319 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 19, 2022).
Pro-Tech was a waterproofing subcontractor for construction of a oceanfront condominium building and was responsible…
In a dispute between two insurers, the Ninth Circuit relied upon Nevada law in finding that the burden of proving that an exception to the exclusion applies was on the insured. Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. Ironshore Specialty Ins. Co., 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 1626 (9th Cir. Jan. 20, 2022).
…
After its prior decision holding there was no coverage for faulty workmanship was remanded by the Michigan Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals remanded to the trial court. Skanska United States Bldg. v. M.A.P. Mech. Contrs., 2021 Mich. App. LEXIS 7336 (Mich. Ct. App. Dec. 28, 2021). The post summarizing the…
The court granted summary judgment to the school district, finding the insured was entitled to a defense against sexual abuse claims alleged against its employee. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co. v. Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. 300, 2021 Ill. App LEXIS 622 (Ill. App. Ct. Nov. 12, 2021).
The School District rented space to the…
The U.S. District Court found that the contractor was entitled to a defense in the underlying state court action. Pa. Nat'l Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Zonko Builders, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168855 (D. Del. Sept. 7, 2021).
Zonko was the general contractor for building the Salt Meadows Townhomes Condominium.
The insurer's motion for summary judgment was granted based upon the "your product" exclusion. Lacaze Land Dev. v. Deere & Co., 2021 U,S. Dist LEXIS 162175 (W.D. La. Aug 26, 2021).
Lacaze filed suit against John Deere, the supplier of a compact loader, skid steer and mulching head, W.L. Doggett…
The Third Circuit affirmed the district court's finding that the insured contractor was entitled to a defense despite the underlying allegations of intentional trespass. Westminster Am. Ins. Co. v. Spruce 1530, LLC, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 24822 (3d. Cir. Aug. 19, 2021).
In the underlying case, the state court found…
The homeowners policy did not cover the insured after he was sued for planting a hidden camera in the bathroom of his neighbors. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Rodriguez, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22161 (D. Haw. Feb. 5, 2021).
The insured's neighbors brought suit alleging that the insured…
While the Arizona Appellate Court found limited coverage for a computer fraud attack against the insured, it also determined there were multiple occurrences. AIMS Ins. Program Managers, Inc. v. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co., 2921 Ariz. App. Unpub. LEXIS 123 (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 4, 2021).
Thieves secretly accessed from an…
Given the underlying allegations of damage to personal property, the court determined the insurer had a duty to defend. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Metropolitan Builders, Inc., 2019 Ill. App. LEXIS 979 (Ill. Ct. App. Dec. 18, 2019).
Metropolitan was hired as the general contractor for construction, renovation and…
