What makes for a more interesting insurance case than a fight between surviving members of the Doors leading to a coverage dispute over the duty to defend?  Applying California case law, which is very similar to Hawaii case law, the Ninth Circuit recently determined St. Paul had a duty to defend a surviving of the

     The Big, Bad Bear of Wall Street disintegrated earlier this week.  Shortly before its demise, the Bear suffered a significant insurance loss at the hands of the New York Court of Appeals.  Vigilant Ins. Co. v. The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc., No. 25 (N.Y. March 13, 2008).

     You may recall

     Reading many Katrina-related cases and the onset of National Flood Safety Awareness Week this week forces me to ponder the purchase of flood insurance.  Every article and relevant website on the subject advocates the purchase of flood insurance. Still, our Honolulu home is on high ground, a mile and a half from the

     Hawaii courts have yet to determine the impact of an anti-concurrent cause provision when a property owner suffers damage caused by wind and rain.  The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland recently found such a provision in a homeowner’s policy barred coverage where both wind and rain caused damage.  Bao v.

     As a former resident of Alaska, I keep close tabs this time of year on the progress of the Iditarod, a sled dog race from Anchorage to Nome, covering 1100 miles.  Six days into the race, the leaders reached Cripple, Alaska today, the halfway point.

     I cannot think of a Hawaii

     A recent post noted the Hawaii legislature’s resurrection of the medical malpractice liability bill.  The Honolulu Advertiser reports the bill was effectively killed two days later. 


     The Hawaii Medical Association promoted the reform legislation, contending a cap on non-economic damages would lower malpractice premiums and reduce some of the uncertainty about

     The New York Court of Appeals recently ruled that commercial property owners can seek “consequential damages” against their insurers who breach the policy.  In reaching its decision, the Court relied, in part, on a decision by the Hawaii Court of Appeals, The Best Place, Inc. v. Penn Am. Ins. Co., 82 Haw. 120,