While not exactly an insurance coverage case per se, the Intermediate Court of Appeals just came out with a new decision on jury instructions in a criminal insurance fraud case.  See State v. Watanabe, No. 26777 (December 31, 2007).  In short, an individual damaged his own car and attempted to file a

     Reuters reports today that the cost of reinsurance has fallen due to another relatively disaster-free year.  Rates for property catastrophe reinsurance, which typically cover hurricanes and earthquakes, are down 9 percent.  The U.S. subprime mortgage market crises has not impacted reinsurers.

     The lack of natural disasters have allowed reinsurers to obtain

The Hawaii Supreme Court just held yesterday that insurance policies with an “assignments require consent” clause cannot be assigned without the insurance company’s consent.  In Del Monte Fresh Produce (Hawaii), Inc. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. the Hawaii Supreme Court expressly held an assignment will not occur as a matter of law, but rather only

     President Bush signed today H.R. 2761, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007, preventing the expiration of the Act on December 31, 2007, and extending the federal insurance program for seven years.  The Act extends coverage to catastrophic acts of not only foreign terrorism but also domestic terrorism.

     In February, 2006, Federal District Court Judge Helen Gillmor granted the insurer’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, determining there was no duty to defend.  Scottdale Ins. Co. v. Sullivan Properties, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11582 (D. Haw., Feb. 27, 2006).   The decision invited Scottsdale move for reimbursement of defense costs.