Although the court agreed the insured's complaint did not trigger coverage under provisions for business income losses and business access prevention by civil authority, the policy contained other provisions under which the trial court should have granted leave to amend. Boffo Cinemas, LLC v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 2023 Cal App. Unpub.

    After the Court of Common Pleas granted summary judgment to the insured on its business interruption claim, the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed. Ungarean v. CNA & Valley Forge Ins. Co., 2022 Pa. Super. LEXIS 467 (Pa. Super. Ct. Nov. 30, 2022). 

    Timothy Ungarean operated a dental practice. As a result

    The Fourth Circuit sought guidance from the West Virginia Supreme Court regarding the proper trigger of coverage for latent illnesses due to exposure to chemicals that leaked from tanks. Westfield Ins. Co. v. Sisterville Tank Works, Inc., 2022 U.S. App,. LEXIS 31403 (4th Cir. Nov. 14, 2022). 

    The tanks were

    The court found there was no coverage for a misrepresentation claim against the insured sellers of a residence. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Coyne, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186417 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 12, 2022).

    Aaron and Tobi Beckman purchased a home from Denise Coyne. The Bockmans alleged in the

    The Ninth Circuit, applying Oregon law, limited the scope of the insuring agreement for "damages because of 'bodily injury'" and found there was no duty to defend. Bliss Sequoia Ins. & Risk Advisors, Inc. v. Allied Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 29905 (9th Cir. Oct. 27, 2022).