The court granted the insured's motion for summary judgment, finding a duty to defend was owed because the policy's Sexual Misconduct Exclusion was ambiguous. Powers v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153265 (D. Nev. Aug. 26, 2024). 

    Plaintiff was sexually assaulted while walking to her apartment.

    The California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's finding that the policy covered a worker's injuries despite the Contractor's Exclusion. Cal. Spec. Insulation . Allied Work Surplus Lines, Ins. Co., 2024 Cal. App. LEXIS 317 (Cal. Ct. App. May 17, 2024). 

    Air Control Systems, Inc. was retained by a

    Finding the exclusion relied upon by the insurer was ambiguous, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that a duty to defend was owed. Mariam, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 15658 (4th Cir. May 15, 2020)

    Tamara Darvish Fallahi sued her father, his company, and

    The Second Circuit reversed the District Court's issuance of summary judgment to the insurer because a windstorm exclusion was deemed ambiguous. 7001 East 71st Street, LLC v. Continental Cas. Co., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 17334 (2nd Cir. June 26, 2018).

    A windstorm during Hurricane Sandy caused the roof of 7001