A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
Summary judgment was awarded to the insureds on their business interruption claim due to governmental closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Henderson Rd. Rest. Sys. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9521 (N.D. Ohio, Jan. 19, 2021).
Plaintiffs owned restaurants in several states. In the spring of 2020…
The court denied the insurer's motion to dismiss a preschool's claim for business interruption due to COVID-19. An endorsement provided coverage for shutdowns by order or recommendation of government authorities due to a communicable disease. Baldwin Acad., Inc. v. Markel Ins. Co., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 239916 (S.D. Calif. Dec. 21, 2020). …
The court granted in part, denied in part, the insurer's motion to dismiss after examining portions of the policy's virus exclusion. Barbershop v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211152 (W.D. Texas, Nov. 4, 2020).
The insured was a barbershop and grooming supply retailer. On March 31…
The federal district court in Virginia denied the insurer's motion to dismiss the insured's claim for losses due to COVID-19. Elegant Massage, LLC v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231935 (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2020).
Elegant Massage owned and operated its business providing therapeutic massages.
A Washington state trial court denied the insurer’s motion to dismiss the insured’s business interruption and civil authority claims arising from COVID-19. Hill and Stout PLLC v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co., No. 20-2-0725-1 (Wash. Super. Ct. Nov. 13, 2020). The case is here.
Plaintiff Hill and Stout PLLC (H&S) was …
The federal district court exercised its discretion under the Declaratory Judgment Act, declining jurisdiction over a case presenting claims arising from COVID-19. Marc Daniel Hospitality, LLC v. AmGuard Ins. Co., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191956 (D. N.J. Oct 16, 2020).
Plaintiff operated an upscale sit-down restaurant and whiskey bar offering…
Among the recent decisions dismissing complaints for business interruption and civil authority coverage due to closures caused by COVID-19 are Pappy's Barber Shops, Inc. v. Farmers Group, Inc., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166808 (S.D. Calif. Sept. 11, 2020) and Sandy Point Dental v. Cincinnati Insurance Co., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171979…
The federal district court in California dismissed the business interruption claim arising from COVID-19 by a Hawaii store chain. Water Sports Kauai v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 2020 U.S. DIst. LEXIS 209547 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2020).
Sand People closed its twelve stores on three islands six months ago due …
The court dismissed the insured business interruption and civil authority claims due to the policy's virus exclusion. Franklin EWC, Inc. v. Hartford Fin. Servs. Group, 2020 U.S. 174010 (N.D. Calif. Sept. 22, 2020).
Franklin operated the European Wax Center. It was forced to close on March 19, 2020, due to State…
The insureds’ motion for summary judgment seeking coverage for business interruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic was granted by the North Carolina Superior Court. North State Deli, LLC, et al. v. The Cincinnati Ins. Co., No. 20-CVS02569, Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Super. Ct. N.C., entered Oct. 9…
