The court found there was no coverage for the insured's transmission to a foreign account held by someone who gained unauthorized access to the account. Construction Fin. Admin. Services, LLC v. Fed Ins. Co., 2022 U.S. Distl LEXIS 103042 (E.D. Pa. June 9, 2022). 

    The insured, Construction Financial Administration Services

    The court found that a fraudster's sending of an email was a "computer use" under the Computer Fraud Insuring Agreement (CFIA) of the policy. City of Unalaska v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51387 (D. Alaska March 18, 2022).

    The city of Unalaska received an email

    While the Arizona Appellate Court found limited coverage for a computer fraud attack against the insured, it also determined there were multiple occurrences. AIMS Ins. Program Managers, Inc. v. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co., 2921 Ariz. App. Unpub. LEXIS 123 (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 4, 2021).

    Thieves secretly accessed from an

    The court found there was no coverage for the property management company after a fraudster sent a false email with wiring instructions, causing a loss of $200,000. Ernst & Haas Mgmt. Co. v. Hiscox, Inc., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218379 (C.D. Calif. Nov. 5, 2020). 

    Ernst & Haas (E&H) employee

    The federal district court granted in part, denied in part, the insurer's motion to dismiss a claim for computer fraud submitted under the insurer's crime protection policy. Childrens Place, Inc. v. Great Am. Ins. Co., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70109 (D. N. J. April 25, 2019).

    On July 24, 2017

    The policy's false pretense exclusion relied upon the insurer to deny coverage for an act of cyber fraud was found ambiguous. Rainforest Chocolate v. Sentinel Ins. Co., 2018 VT LEXIS 140 (Vt. Dec. 28, 2018).

    Rainforest Chocolate, LLC was insured under a business-owner policy issued by Sentinel. In May 2016