The insured's COVID-19 claim was dismissed under one policy, but survived a motion to dismiss under a second Restaurant Recovery Policy. Menchies Group, inc. v. Mass Bay Ins Co., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153933 (S.D. N.Y. Aug. 31, 2023). 

    Menchies owned and operated frozen yogurt shops throughout the United States.

    To await a decision from the Washington Supreme Court, the federal district court stayed the COVID-19 coverage action pending before it. Reckless Enter. v. First Mercury Ins. Co., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120832 (W.D. Wash. July 8, 2022). 

    Plaintiff owned and operated a restaurant that lost income during the height

    In another victory for policy holders on business interruption claims arising from COVID-19, the federal district court denied the insurer's motion to dismiss on one of two claims. Kingray Inc. v. Farmers Group Inc., et al., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41300 (C. D. Cal. March 4, 2021).

    Plaintiff Kingray Inc.

    Following its earlier decision, the federal district court rejected the insurer's motion to dismiss claims for business interruption due to closure orders caused by COVID-19. Blue Spring Dental Care, LLC v. Owners Ins. Co., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172639 (W.D. Mo. Sept. 21, 2020).

    Plaintiffs were four dental clinics impacted