A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
The excess carrier did to have to contribute to the defense and indemnity of the insureds because the dissolution of one of the primary carriers meant full exhaustion had not been accomplished. Continental Cas. Co., et al. v. Argonaut Ins. Co., et al., 331 Ore. App. 26 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
…
The court found there was no coverage for a misrepresentation claim against the insured sellers of a residence. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Coyne, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186417 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 12, 2022).
Aaron and Tobi Beckman purchased a home from Denise Coyne. The Bockmans alleged in the…
The federal district court granted the injured parties' motion to intervene in the insurer's coverage action because there was a protectable interest in being compensated for their injuries. Island Premier Ins. Co. v. Campus, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179787 (D. Haw. Sept. 30, 2022).
Defendant Terrence Campos was involved in…
