The Ninth Circuit asked the California Supreme Court to address whether the policy's virus exclusion  was enforceable to preclude coverage for business income losses due to the present of COVID-19 at the insured's properties. French Laundry Partners LP v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 2845 (9th Cir. Feb. 6

    The California Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's grant of the insurer's demurrer on a COVID-19 claim and remanded the case for further proceedings. John's Grill v. Hartford Fin. Servs. Group, 2022 Cal. App. LEXIS 1056 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 27, 2022). 

    John's Grill had two insurers, Hartford and

    The Ohio Court of Common Pleas granted the insured's motion for summary judgment, denied the insurer's motion for summary judgment and and set the COVID-19, business interruption case for trial on damages. McKinley Dev. Leasing Co. v. Westfield Ins. Co., 2021 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 885 (Ohio Ct. Pleas Nov. 14, 2021). 

 

    The California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the insured's business interruption claim based upon COVID-19 government shutdown orders. The Inns by the Sea v. California Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 Cal. App. LEXIS 956 (Calif. Ct. App. Nov. 15, 2021). The Inns is the first state appellate court decision

    Determining that government shutdown orders during the pandemic were a physical cause of loss and finding the virus exclusion ambiguous, the court denied the insurer's motion to dismiss. Risinger Holdings v. Sentinel Ins. Co., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192474 (D. E.D. Texas Sept. 30, 2021).

    Risinger owed several orthodontic practices. It held a policy

    The insured furniture retailer survived a motion to dismiss its business interruption claim after government orders caused disruption of the insured's operations due to COVID-19. Susan Spath Hegedus v. Ace Fire Underwriters Ins. Co., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88041 (E.D. Pa. May 7, 2021).

    Plaintiff operated two locations in California.