In Sturla, Inc. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 67 Haw. 203, 684 P.2d 960 (1984), the Hawai`i Supreme Court determined that the distributor of allegedly defective carpet was an insured under a Vendor’s Endorsement, but found there was no coverage based on exclusions in the policy. The opposite result was reached in
Uncategorized
Florida and Allstate Resolve Differences – For Now
In a prior post, we discussed Florida’s ongoing investigation of Allstate’s alleged collusion with other insurance companies to keep insurance rates artificially high. When Allstate failed to comply with a subpoena in January and testify about its property insurance business, it was suspended by Florida’s Office of Insurance Regulation.
Allstate’s…
California Court Finds Binding Arbitration Provision in Insurer’s Enrollment Application Unenforceable
Unlike California, Hawai`i law does not statutorily impose strict disclosure requirements when an insurance enrollment application mandates that disputes be resolved solely by arbitration. California courts, on the other hand, narrowly construe an insurer’s attempt to limit disputes to arbitration, as evidenced by the recent decision in Rodriguez v. Blue Cross of California…
Consider Flood Insurance as Another Hurricane Season Approaches
In a prior post, we noted that much of Honolulu has yet to be mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency for flood insurance purposes. This leaves neighborhoods unrated for flood insurance, resulting in high premiums even for areas not prone to floods.
An informative story appearing over the weekend in…
Seventh Circuit Narrows Scope of Coverage Under Umbrella Policies
Umbrella coverage typically provides two types of coverage: excess coverage and gap-filling coverage, which obligates the insurer to defend for any loss covered by the terms and conditions of the umbrella policy and not covered by the primary policy. In Dairy Road Partners v. Island Ins. Co., Ltd., 92 Hawai`i, 992 P.2d 93 …
Hawaii Appellate Court Affirms Denial of PIP Benefits Based on Indendent Medical Exam by Insurer’s Doctor
At stake in Gillan v. Government Employees Insurance Co., No. 28075 (Haw. Ct. App. April 17, 2008), was whether the insurer could deny Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits based upon a review of medical records by a doctor chosen by the insurer but without the insured’s approval.
Gillian was injured in an accident while …
Fees Hawaii Charges Insurance Companies Deemed Unconstitutional Tax
Although it did not address insurance coverage, the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) issued an important decision regarding the state’s regulation of the insurance industry in Hawaii Insurers Council v. Lingle, et al, No. 27840 (Haw. Ct. App. April 14, 2008).
The Insurance Regulation Fund (IRF) was established by the legislature in 1999, …
Ninth Circuit Strikes Down Requirement for In-State Agent to Sign Off on Policy
Hawaii does not require a non-resident agent to secure approval for a newly written policy from a Hawaii resident agent. Nevada, however, does have such a law. The Ninth Circuit recently struck down Nevada’s countersignature law as a violation of the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV. See Council of Insurance …
Ninth Circuit’s Latest Coverage Case Finds No Coverage Under Auto Policy
Continuing with its recent torrent of insurance coverage cases, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed whether an officer and director were covered under the corporation’s auto policy. See Progressive Casualty Ins. C. v. Owen, No. 06-35677 (9th Cir. March 26, 2008). The case relied on Montana law, which follow principles similar to those …
Ninth Circuit Again Considers Maritime Doctrine of Uberraimae Fidei
How often does a court take on the doctrine of uberrimae fidei? The Hawaii appellate courts have never confronted uberrimae fidei. The Ninth Circuit, however, has addressed the doctrine twice in a little more than a month. We addressed in a prior post the Ninth Circuit’s prior handling of the …