2009

    Acknowledging that the insured's cotton was damaged by an occurrence, the Eighth Circuit nonetheless affirmed the district court's denial of coverage based upon an exclusion.  See Michigan Millers Mut. Ins. Co. v. DG&D Co., Inc., No. 08-2699, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14236 (8th Cir. July 1, 2009).

    The insured operated a cotton gin.  After delivering 50,000

    The New York Court of Appeals considered whether a Landlord was an additional insured under a policy obtained by the Tenant.  See Kassis v. The Ohio Casualty Ins. Co., No. 117 (N.Y. Ct. App. June 25, 2009). 

    The Landlord leased property to the insured, who, pursuant to the lease, obtained a commercial general liability insurance

    Two issues were presented in Stewart Enterprises, Inc. v. RSUI Indem. Co., Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50156 (E.D. La. June 15 2009).  First, was the excess carrier's following form policy was bound by the primary carrier's exception to the flood exclusion?  Second, was the primary policy's anti-concurrent causation clause applicable?

    The insured owed various cemeteries, funeral

    If you have ever sought out of network health care, here is a story to make your blood boil. 

    Today's New York Times reports that Congressional investigators have discovered a faulty database overcharged patients for seeing doctors outside their insurance plan network.  The database was operated by Ingenix, a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group.  The Congressional