April 2010

   The court considered the validity of a contractual provision to provide insurance when the indemnity clause was deemed invalid.  See Travelers Lloyds Ins. Co. v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7113 (5th Cir. April 6, 2010).

   The landlord, The Centre, leased commercial property to the tenant, Best Buy Stores, Inc.  Pursuant to the

   Whether a duty to defend was triggered by allegations of the failure to disclose a chemical's dangerous characteristics was the issue in Shell Chemical L.P. v. Discover Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30143 (S.D. Tex. March 29, 2010). 

   Mission Petroleum was an interstate carrier delivering naphtha to one

    After being sued in a personal injury action, Marc-Scot Realty (property owner) and Willie Construction, sought a defense as additional insureds under Arch Builder's (general contractor) liability policy.  See Marc-Scot Realty Corp v. Praetorian Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29380 (E.D. N.Y. March 26, 2010). 

    The court agreed Willie Construction was an

   The insureds originally had flood coverage with Allstate.  See Dennis v. Fidelity Nat. Prop. and Cas. Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28759 (March 25, 2010).  To reduce their premiums, the insureds requested their agent, Lyons Insurance, Inc., to obtain a new flood insurance policy on their home in May 2007.  The insureds did not submit the required elevation

   In Kaufmann v. The Travelers Companies, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20027 (D. Md. March 5, 2010), the insureds sold their restaurant to plaintiffs.  The insureds represented that the restaurant and bar seated 400 patrons.  The plaintiffs made known to the insureds they intended to create a patio that would utilize the 400