November 2013

   The Illinois Appellate Court found that an insurance agent was liable under both a state statute and common law for failure to obtain coverage requested by the insured. Skaperdas v. Country Cas. Ins. Co., 2013 Ill. App. LEXIS 711(Ill.Ct. App. Oct. 7, 2013). 

   The insured's girlfriend was added to his policy as

   The New Jersey Supreme Court considered the appropriate allocation for costs of the cleanup of contaminated property when one of the two insurers became insolvent. Farmers Mut. Fire Ins. Co v. N.J. Prop. Liab. Ins. Guar. Ass'n, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 902 (N.J. Sept. 24, 2013).

   Newark Insurance Company issued a homeowner's policy

   The court rejected the insurer's arguments that the business risk exclusions barred coverage for a contractor. Gen. Cas. Co. of Wisconsin v. Five Star Bldg. Corp., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134122 (D. Mass. Sept. 19, 2013).

    Five Star was hired by the University of Massachusetts to upgrade the ventilation (HVAC) system

   Judge Mollway, U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Hawaii, found the insurer was not in bad faith for allegedly leading its insured to believe that construction defects would be covered under the policy. The court, however, allowed the insured's negligent misrepresentation claim to survive summary judgment. Ill Nat'l Ins. Co v. Nordic