After vandals caused extensive water damage to the insured's building, the claim for resulting loss was rejected by the federal district court. Epperson v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102028 (S.D. Ohio May 29, 2025). 

    The insured's borrower defaulted on a loan for purchase of a 78,000 square

    The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to the insurer despite the insured's claim it was not adequately compensated for its loss. In the Matter of New York Inn, Inc., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 7887 (5th Cir. April 3, 2025). 

    Viva Inn Motel submitted a claim

    The Florida Supreme Court resolved a conflict between the District Courts in applying the Concurrent Causation Doctrine where there were multiple causes creating the loss. Sebo v. Am. Home Assur. Co., 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2596 (Fla. Dec. 1, 2016).

    After purchasing his home, John Sebo procured an "all risks" homeowners policy provided by American Home Assurance

   Exclusions in the plaintiffs' policy barred coverage for loss caused by heavy rain storms. Emsbo v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86072 (D. R.I. June 19, 2013).

   Torrential rain and historic flooding was experienced in Rhode Island in March 2010. The heavy rains over-flowed plaintiffs' rain gutters and flooded

   In an unpublished opinion, the California Court of Appeal determined there was no coverage for damage caused by a leaking pipe, including mold. Brown v. Mid-Century Ins. Co., 2013 Cal App. Unpub. LEXIS 2389 (Cal. Ct. App. April 2, 2013).

   In February 2009, the insureds noticed condensation on the windows of their