February 2015

   Where the building was damaged by both a covered cause and a non-covered cause, the policy's anti-concurrent/anti-sequential causation clause barred coverage for a collapsed building. Ashrit Realty LLC v. Tower Nat'l Ins. Co., 2015 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 107 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Jan. 20, 2015).

   The property sustained moderate damage

   The New Hampshire Supreme Court found some of the property damage evolving from the insured's portion of the work was covered under its liability policy. Cogswell Farm Condo. Ass'n v. Tower Group, Inc., 2015 N.H. LEXIS 3 (N.H. Jan. 13, 2015). 

   Lemery Building Company, Inc. constructed and developed 24 residential condominium units.

   Disagreeing with the excess carrier's interpretation of the primary policy, the court determined the commercial property policy was a blanket policy, thereby invoking additional excess coverage. Landmark Am. Ins. Co. v. Pin-Pon Corp., 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 189 (Fla. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2015).

   The insured purchased a hotel. Renovations were planned

   This year's Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee's CLE Seminar will be conducted in Tucson, Arizona, from March 4-7, 2015. Each year, the conference offers informative, cutting-edge sessions on a variety of insurance-related topics. Participants from across the country with varying perspectives on insurance coverage, including lawyers, judges, risk managers, and insurance professionals, will be attendance. The