A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
Bound by well-established case law in Pennsylvania, the federal district court ruled that there was no coverage for alleged faulty workmanship. Peerless Ins. Co. & Ohio Sec. Ins. Co. v. Manown Builders, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85261 (W.D. Pa. June 30, 2016).
Manown was sued by the homeowners after they noticed in…
The court denied National Union's motion to dismiss the insured's suit to compel a defense under the umbrella policies. San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88362 (S. D. Cal. July 6, 2016).
National Union sold the insured primary and umbrella policies, promising to defend and…
The federal district court predicted that business interruption caused by smoke from a nearby wildfire would be covered under Oregon law. Oregon Shakespeare Festival Assoc. v. Great Am. Ins.. Co., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74450 (D. Ore. June 7, 2016).
The insured operated the Shakespeare Festival in three venues, one of which was an…
The insurer unsuccessfully moved for a determination that it had no duty to defend a public adjuster. Singer v. Continental Cas. Co., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82286 (E.D. Pa. June 24, 2016).
Plaintiffs in the underlying action alleged that the public adjuster, Brian Singer, negligently performed his duties while assessing and inspecting a claimed loss…
Distinguishing its seminal case on coverage for construction defects, Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc., 81 N.J. 233 (1979), the New Jersey Supreme Court determined that rain damage to the building caused by a subcontractor's faulty workmanship constituted "property damage" and an "occurrence" under the property developer's CGL policy. Cypress Point Condo. Ass'n v.Towers…
My colleagues Rina Carmel, Karin Aldama and I authored an article entitled, "Determining Whether and When the Duty to Defend Ends." The article appears in the current edition of Coverage, published by the Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee of the ABA. The article is here.
The article discusses common issues that arise in determining…
The federal magistrate predicted that the Oregon appellate courts would not adopt the owner-claimant rule, restricting recovery under the policy to the time period during which the insured owned the property. Am. States Ins. Co. v. PIH Beaverton LLC, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83188 (D. Or. May 3, 2016).
PIH purchased a hotel in…
The Court granted the insurer's motion to dismiss because the injury occurred after the policy period had expired. Goins v. C&S Global Imports, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79160 (W.D. Ky. June 17, 2016).
Plaintiff James Goin visited the site of a deer hunt on property owned by Kevin Turn…
The court granted the insurer's motion to dismiss a lessor's complaint seeking coverage because the lessor was not insured under the lessee's policy. Dynasty Int'l LLC v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78443 (N.D. Ind. June 16, 2016).
Plaintiffs leased property to Chrysler Realty Company LLC (CRC). The lease required CRC to…
The First Circuit Court of Appeals certified questions to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) on whether the insurer's duty to defend required paying for the insured's pursuit of counterclaims. Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co. v. VisionAid, Inc., 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10464 (1st Cir. June 9, 2016).
VisionAid…
