Affirming the District Court, the Seventh Circuit agreed that the broad evidence rule was used under Indiana law to determine actual cash value. Thorne v. Member Select Ins. Co., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 3265 (7th Cir. Feb. 12, 2018).
Thorne's home burned to the ground in February 2008. Member Select
The Illinois Court of Appeals reversed summary judgment entered for the insurer and found the general contractor, an additional insured under the policy, was entitled to a defense. Hastings Mut. Ins. Co. v. Blinderman Constr. Co., Inc., 2017 Ill. App. LEXIS 661 (Ill. Ct. App. Oct. 24, 2017).
Blinderman was
The insured contractor was not entitled to independent Cumis counsel despite suing the insurer in a cross-claim. Centex Homes v. St. Palu Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 2018 Cal. App. LEXIS 45 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 22, 2018).
Homeowners sued Centex Homes for construction defects. Centex tendered defense of the suit to
The Florida District Court reversed erroneous jury instructions that adopted the efficient proximate cause doctrine in determining whether the insurer was responsible for the insureds’ collapsed roof. Jones v. Federated National Ins. Co., 2018 Fla. App. LEXIS 561 (Fla. Ct. App. Jan. 17, 2018).
The insureds filed a claim for their damaged roof,
The Third Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of the insured's lawsuit for denial of flood coverage after the complaint was filed more than one year after the insurer rejected the proof of loss. Migliaro v. Fidelity Nat'l Indem. Ins. Co., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 2097 (3d Cir. Jan. 29, 2018).
Affirming the district court, the Eighth Circuit found that deteriorated bags which unintentionally mixed with landscaping materials did not amount to property damage under the CGL policy. Decker Plastics Corp. v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 2085 (8th Cir. Jan. 29, 2018). The district court's decision was the
The insurer's motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the insured's claim for collapse coverage was rejected by the Supreme Court of New York. Parauda v. Encompass Ins. Co. of Am., 2018 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 269 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Jan. 25, 2018).
The insureds submitted a claim to Encompass for
The Federal District Court, District of Hawaii, overruled the insured's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations awarding partial fees. Hanover Ins. Co. v. Anova Food, LLC, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEIXS 11493 (D. Haw. Jan. 24, 2018).
A prior post set forth the background of the case. In a
Our panel addressed cyber coverage at tiday’s ABA Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee’s meeting My distinguished colleagues- Demetrius Rush, Karin Aldama, Jamie Carsey and Rina Carmel
