June 2020

    Finding the exclusion relied upon by the insurer was ambiguous, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that a duty to defend was owed. Mariam, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 15658 (4th Cir. May 15, 2020)

    Tamara Darvish Fallahi sued her father, his company, and

    The Eighth Circuit found there was no coverage for the insured's faulty workmanship. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., S.I. v. Mid-American Grain Distributors, LLC, 958 F.3d 748 (8th Cir. 2020).

    Mid-American contracted with Lehenbauer to design and construct a grain storage and distribution facility for Lehenbauer. Before the work was

    The court found that the policy's anti-sequential clause barred coverage for damage caused by Hurricane Sandy. Estate of Doerfler v. Fed. Ins. Co., 2020 N.J. Sup. Unpub. LEXIS 920 (May 14, 2020).

    The insureds held identical homeowners policies from Chubb and Federal Insurance Company. Damage resulting from flood was not

    The Federal District Court, District of Hawaii, found the earth movement exclusion barred coverage for the contractor when a landslide damaged the property. North River Ins. Co. v. H.K. Constr. Corp., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90110 (D. Haw. May 22, 2020). 

    Bruce and Yulin Bingle sued HK for damage caused

    In another round of litigation involving coverage issues between Montrose Chemical Corporation and its insurers, the California Supreme Court ruled in favor of Montrose, adopting vertical exhaustion of excess policies. Montrose Chem. Corp. of Calif. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 9 Ca. 5th 215 (2020).

    In 1990