April 2025

    Faced with a motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by several of its insurers, the insured was successful in arguing that the Loss of Attraction endorsement in one insurer's policy allowed the insured to pursue losses suffered by its businesses due to COVID-19. BBX Capital Corp. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., et

    The court denied cross-motions from the insured and the insurer after the insured’s dwelling suffered a collapse of the ceiling. Simons v. Fed. Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75839 (C.D. Calif. March 4, 2025).

    Gary Simons bought a second home located in Park City, Utah (“Utah Property”) that was

    In answering a certified question from the Ninth Circuit, the Alaska Supreme Court determined that an insured could reasonably expect coverage for injuries resulting form exposure to carbon monoxide from an improperly installed home applicance.

    Josiah Wheeler rented a cabin owned by Deborah Overly and Terry Summers. While living in the

    The homeowner's complaint was improperly dismissed without leave to amend to demonstrate she was a third-party beneficiary of a lender-placed policy on her home. Williams v. Integon Nat'l Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. App LEXIS 6919 (5th Cir. March 25, 2025).

    Ellen Williams purchased a home which was mortgaged by Flagstar

    The federal district court found that the insurer must defend portions of the underlying case based upon alleged faulty workmanship. Motorist Commercial Mutual Ins. Co. v. Ellison Distributing Inc., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35279 (D. Ind,. Feb. 27, 2025). 

    Daily Feed & Grain, Inc. (DFG) farmed, produced and sold grain. Ellison

    The insured's claim against his broker for failure to secure adequate coverage was dismissed by the federal district court. Galapatos v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, 2025 U.S. Disl. LEXIS 32833 (D. Mass. Feb. 24, 2025). 

    Nicholas Galapatos purchased a boat (Galani) in 2015 to use in Greece. He retained Marsh