August 2025

    In a dispute between two insurers regarding which had a duty to defend in the underlying lawsuit, the federal district court denied one insurer's motion to join the underlying plaintiff as a necessary party. Amerisure Ins. Co. v. Burlington Ins. Group, Inc., 2025 U.S. Distl LEXIS 144927 (N.D. Ill. July 29, 2025). 

    The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that the appraisers appointed under the policy provisions to establish the amount of loss could also find the cause of the loss. Mesco Manufacturing, LLC v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 18598 (7th Cir. July 25, 2025). 

    Mesco Manufacturing

    The federal district court agreed that a challenge to State Farm's practice of depreciating sales tax when calculating actual cash value (ACV) benefits payments to policyholders could go forward as a class action. Pitkin, et al. v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134948 (July 15, 2025, N.

    The curt denied the broker's motion to dismiss the insured's claim that the broker negligently failed to provide the requested coverage. The Paper Tigers, Inc. v. Arch Ins. Group, Inc., et al, 2025 US. Dist. LEXIS 128114 (N.D. Ill. July 7, 2025). 

    The Paper Tigers, Inc. (Plaintiff) specialized in reworking paper to meet

    The Superior Court granted summary judgment to a policy holder who was issued a policy by the California's insurer of last resort, known as the FAIR Plan. Aliff v. California FAIR Plan Association, No. 21STCV200095 (Super. Ct. California June 24, 2025). 

    Plaintiff sued the California Fair Plan Association (CFP) arguing