A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
The court found there was no duty to defend or indemnify under a pollution policy for claims arising from a building fire. URS Corp. v. Zurich Am Ins. Co., 2014 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 222 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Jan. 16, 2014).
Two firemen were killed while fighting a fire at the Deutsch Bank…
The Delaware Superior Court found the insurer had a duty to indemnify the additional insured for settlement proceeds in a wrongful death suit. Premcor Ref. Group v. Matrix Serv. Indus. Contrs., 2013 Del. Super. LEXIS 517 (Del. Super. Ct. Nov. 18, 2013).
Premcor hired Pro-Tech to coordinate work at an oil refinery.
The court determined there were sufficient allegations in the underlying complaint and third party complaints to raise a duty to defend for the additional insured. Ill. Emcasco Ins. Co. v. Waukegan Steel Sales, 2013 Ill. App. LEXIS 624 (Ill. Ct. App. Sept. 13, 2013).
Waukegan was named as an additional insured under subcontractor…
Notice of a claim from the additional insured was sufficient even though the named insured failed to give proper notice as required by the policy. Mt. Hawley Co. v. Robinette Demolition, Inc., 2013 Ill. App. LEXIS 499 (Ill. Ct. App. July 26, 2013).
Robinette and Cobra Concrete Cutting Service, Inc. entered an…
The Fifth Circuit certified questions to the Texas Supreme Court regarding BP's status as an additional insured under policies issued to Transocean. In Re Deepwater Horizon, Ranger Ins. , Ltd. v. Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc., 2013 U.S. App. Ct. LEXIS 18087. The Fifth Circuit determined in March that the polices, and…
The Seventh Circuit found that an "Injury to Employees, Contractors, and Employees of Contractors" exclusion was not applicable to bar coverage for injuries to a construction worker. Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co. v. Paszko Masonry, Inc., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 11561 (7th Cir. June 7, 2013).
The underlying plaintiff was an employee of a waterproofing…
The court grappled with whether defendants named in the underlying case were "additional insureds" under the policy. Colony Ins. Co. v. Price, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38952 (N.D. Texas March 21, 2013).
Colony insured Tommy Sinclair under a CGL policy. Sinclair operated a nightclub. A patron was assaulted outside the club and…
The Fifth Circuit found that Transocean's policies, not the indemnity provisions of Transocean's and BP's drilling contract, controlled the extent to which BP was covered as an additional insured for its operations under the drilling contract. Ranger Ins., Ltd v. Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc., 2013 U.S. App. Ct. LEXIS 4512 (5th Cir.
The Washington Supreme Court held that the arbitration provision in James Rivers' policy was unenforceable. State of Washington, Department of Transportation v. James River Ins. Co., 2013 Wash. LEXIS 66 (Wash. Jan. 17, 2013).
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) was an additional insured on a policy issued by James River.
The court analyzed the impact of the policy exclusion barring coverage where one insured sued another. Gemini Ins. Co. v. Delos Ins. Co., 2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 1230 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 5, 2012).
Delos insured Bobby's, a restaurant, located in the Loch Lomond Marina, San Rafael, California. The landlord was Loch…
