A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
Whether a duty to defend was triggered by allegations of the failure to disclose a chemical's dangerous characteristics was the issue in Shell Chemical L.P. v. Discover Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30143 (S.D. Tex. March 29, 2010).
Mission Petroleum was an interstate carrier delivering naphtha to one…
After being sued in a personal injury action, Marc-Scot Realty (property owner) and Willie Construction, sought a defense as additional insureds under Arch Builder's (general contractor) liability policy. See Marc-Scot Realty Corp v. Praetorian Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29380 (E.D. N.Y. March 26, 2010).
The court agreed Willie Construction was an…
In a brief opinion, a New York court found the insured contract provision ambiguous. See Majawalla v. Utica First Ins. Co., 2010 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2510 (N.Y. App. Div. March 23, 2010).
Yashi Associates leased a store location to the insured. The lease required the lessee to maintain liability insurance for the…
The additional insured contractor was not entitled to a defense where the underlying case failed to allege any negligence by insured subcontractor. See Clarendon Nat. Ins. Co. v. Am. States Ins. Co., No. 09-548-JO, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16091 (D. Ore. Feb. 22, 2010).
Providence built houses and subcontracted with Woodmaster to…
If the named insured does not satisfy the self-insured retention (SIR), can the additional insured undertake payment to trigger coverage? Looking at the language of the policies under consideration, the court answered no in Forecast Homes, Inc. v. Steadfast Ins. Co., No. G040876, 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 172 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 12…
Does a policy's Blanket Additional Insured Endorsement bar primary coverage for an additional insured with a policy of its own? Although the court answered yes in Kummer Enter., Inc. v. HBE Corp., No. 1:09-cv-109, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6403 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 27, 2010), it nevertheless determined the additional insured was entitled to a…
The insureds' property was rented from the State of Hawai`i . See State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co. v. Ramirez, No. 08-00557, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5045 (D. Haw. Jan. 22, 2010). The insureds and the State were sued by neighbors for a dumpsite/landfill maintained on the property. The underlying complaint alleged the…
Although the excess insurer sought a narrow reading of "additional insured," the policy's failure to define the coverage allowed a broad reading of the term in Kerrigan v. RM Associates, Inc., No. 100316/08, 2009 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9517 (N.Y. App. Civ. Dec. 29, 2009).
The decedent was killed in a construction accident. …
The Texas Supreme Court recently held that an insurer may have a duty to indemnify even if the duty to defend never arises. See D.R. Horton-Texas, Ltd. v. Markel Int'l Ins. Co, Ltd., No. 06-1018, 2009 Tex. LEXIS 1042 (Tex. Dec. 11, 2009).
The homeowners purchased their house from D.R. Horton. After moving…
Allegations in the underlying complaint proved crucial in analyzing coverage for an additional insured under Texas' eight-corners rule. See The Burlington N. and Santa Fe R. R. Co. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., No. 08-06-00022CV, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 9347 (Tex. Ct. App. Dec. 9, 2009).
The railroad entered…
