Distinguishing its seminal case on coverage for construction defects, Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc., 81 N.J. 233 (1979), the New Jersey Supreme Court determined that rain damage to the building caused by a subcontractor's faulty workmanship constituted "property damage" and an "occurrence" under the property developer's CGL policy. Cypress Point Condo. Ass'n v.Towers
Comprehensive General Liability
Insured Need Not Own Property When Property Damage Occurs
The federal magistrate predicted that the Oregon appellate courts would not adopt the owner-claimant rule, restricting recovery under the policy to the time period during which the insured owned the property. Am. States Ins. Co. v. PIH Beaverton LLC, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83188 (D. Or. May 3, 2016).
PIH purchased a hotel in…
Federal Court Again Confirms No Coverage For Construction Defects in Hawaii
The Hawaii federal district court confirmed its prior holdings that there is no duty to defend or indemnify for property damage caused by faulty workmanship. State Farm Fire & Cas Co. v. GP West, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74240 (D. Haw. Jun 7, 2016). (Full disclosure – our office represents GP West in…
Iowa Court Holds Defective Work Performed by Insured’s Subcontractor Constitutes an “Occurrence”
The Iowa Supreme Court held that property damage caused by a subcontractor's defective work was an "occurrence." Nat'l Sur. Corp. v. Westlake Invs., LLC, 880 N.W. 2d 724 (Iowa 2016).
In 2002, the insureds, the developers and general contractor, began construction on an apartment complex. While the complex was still…
Duty to Defend Continues After Response to 104 (e) Letter Submitted
The Ninth Circuit held that the insurers' duty to defend did not cease after the insured submitted its response to the EPA in a section 104 (e) letter. Ash Grove Cement Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8663 (9th Cir. May 11, 2016).
Ash Grove operated two cement plants…
No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Where Underlying Claim is Strictly Breach of Contract
Considering certified questions from the federal district court, the Arkansas Supreme Court followed a prior decision in deciding there was no coverage for property loss caused by faulty workmanship based solely on breach of contract. Columbia Ins. Group, Inc. v. Cenark Project Mgt. Services, Inc., 2016 Ark. LEXIS 185 (Ark. April 28, 2016).
…
“Occurrence” May Include Intentional Acts In Montana
The Montana Supreme Court found that policy language defining "accidents may include intentional acts." Employers Mut. Cas. Co. v. Fisher Builders, Inc., 2016 Mont. LEXIS 269 (Mont. Sup. Ct. April 19, 2016).
Jerry and Karen Slack hired Fisher Builders to build a remodeled home located on the site of their…
No Indemnity After Insured Settles Breach of Implied Warranty of Habitability Claims
Applying Illinois law, the federal district court ruled that there was no coverage for the insured's settlement of claims based upon breach of the implied warranty of habitability. Allied Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Metro North Condo. Ass'n, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43452 (E.D. Ill. March 31, 2016).
Metro North sued…
Insurer Must Defend Data Breach Claims
The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's holding that data breach claims were a covered publication. Travelers Indem. Co. of Am. v. Portal Healthcare Solutions, L.L.C., 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 6554 (4th Cir. April 11, 2016).
A class-action complaint was filed against Portal Healthcare Solutions alleging that Portal allowed plaintiffs' private medical…
Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Inverse Condemnation Action
The South Carolina Court of Appeals found there was no coverage for an inverse condemnation action based upon the policy's pollution exclusion. South Carolina Ins. Reserve Fund v. E. Richland County Public Service District, 2016 S. C. App. LEXIS 32 (S.C. Ct. App. March 23, 2016).
In 2010, Coley Brown filed a complaint…