A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
The Wisconsin Court of Appeals determined an occurrence could follow the insured's intentional act when the harm caused was not intentional. Riverbank Farms v. Saukville Feed Supplies, 2023 Wisc. App. LEXIS 813 (Wis. Ct. App. July 26, 2023).
Riverback was a dairy farm. It purchased feed mix from Saukville. Riverback's…
Predicting Georgia law, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's decision that Georgia would not allow insurers to seek reimbursement of defense costs. Continental Cas. Co., et. al v. Winder Laboratories, LLC, et. al, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 17852 (11th Cir. July 13, 2023).
Winder Laboratories held two policies, a…
The Wisconsin Supreme Court departed from its previous mechanism for determining property damage under the "integrated systems analysis" and found the insurers were not entitled to summary judgment as determined by the trial court. 5 Walworth, LLC v. Engerman Contracting, Inc., 2023 Wis. LEXIS 152 (Wis. June 20, 2023).
5…
The court found that the insurer continued to be bound by a defense agreement entered with the insured who merged with another company. Continental Ins. Co. v. Neles-Jamesbury, Inc., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52521 (D. Mass. March 28, 2023).
In 1990, Neles-Jamesbury became the sucessor by merger to the liabilities…
The court determined there was no coverage for an adverse arbitration decision suffered by the insured in a construction defect case. Am. Fire and Cas. Co. v. Unforgettable Coatings, Inc., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64846 (D. Nev. April 13, 2023).
Unforgettable contracted with Muirfield Village Homeowner's Association for painting and…
The Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, found that the lower court properly determined that the wrap-exclusion applied to the insured even though it was not enrolled in the Wrap-up Insurance Program for the project. Skanska USA Building Inc. v. Harleysville Ins. Co., 2023 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1893 (N.Y. App.
Interpreting Massachusetts law, the federal district court determined consequential damage resulting from the insured's faulty work triggered a duty to defend. Capitol Spec. Ins. Corp. v. Dello Russo Enter. LLC, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11627 (D. Mass. Jan. 24, 2023).
Peta-Gay and Michael Print sued the insured, Dello Russo, who…
The court found the insurer must defend because there was a possibility of damage to property due to work not performed by the insured. B&W Paving & Landscape, LLC v. Employers Mut. Cas. Co., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225783 (D. Conn. Dec. 15, 2022).
In 2010, Whiting Turner Contracting Company…
In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's finding that the insurers' reservation of rights letters did not provide a basis for denial of coverage. Stoneiedge At Lake Keowee Owners Ass'n Inc. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 2022 US. App. LEXIS 34292 (4th Dist. Dec. 13, 2022).
…
The Fourth Circuit sought guidance from the West Virginia Supreme Court regarding the proper trigger of coverage for latent illnesses due to exposure to chemicals that leaked from tanks. Westfield Ins. Co. v. Sisterville Tank Works, Inc., 2022 U.S. App,. LEXIS 31403 (4th Cir. Nov. 14, 2022).
The tanks were…
