Answering a certified question, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals adopted the continuous-trigger theory when interpreting occurrence based policies. Westfield Ins. Co. v. Sistersville Tank Works, Inc., 2023 W. Va. LEXIS 455 (W. Va. Nov. 8, 2023).

    Sistersville Tank Work, Inc. ("STW") manufactured, installed, and repaired various types of tanks

    The Fourth Circuit sought guidance from the West Virginia Supreme Court regarding the proper trigger of coverage for latent illnesses due to exposure to chemicals that leaked from tanks. Westfield Ins. Co. v. Sisterville Tank Works, Inc., 2022 U.S. App,. LEXIS 31403 (4th Cir. Nov. 14, 2022). 

    The tanks were

    The New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, adopted the continuous trigger for establishing which insurers were on the risk for construction defect claims. Air Master & Cooling, Inc. v. Selective Ins. Co. of Am., 2017 N.J. Super. LEXIS 144 (N.J. Super. Ct., App. Div. Oct. 10, 2017).

    The insured, Air Master, worked

    The court rejected the insurer's argument that two triggers – one for exposure to asbestos and one for resulting injury – were required under CGL policies. Compass Ins. Co. v. University Mechanical and Engineering Contractors, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (N.D. Cal. March 25, 2016). 

    University Mechanical and Engineering Contractors, Inc. (UMEC)

   Applying the manifestation trigger, the Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed denial of coverage where the property damage manifested after the policy period expired. Landry v. Williamson, 2015 La. App. Unpub. LEXIS 213 (La. Ct. App. May 1, 2015).

   On August 28, 2002, the Burkarts purchased a home from the Williamsons. One month

   The Pennsylvania Supreme Court addressed when a liability policy was triggered for ongoing property damage. The Court also declined to apply the multiple trigger theory. Pennsylvania Nat'l Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. v. John, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 3313 (Pa. Dec. 15, 2014).

   In 2002, Appellants, co-owners of a dairy farm, expanded the size

   In an significant decision touching on a host of issues, the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) overturned the circuit court and found numerous insurers had a duty to defend its insured for bodily injury and property damage caused by the 2006 breach of the Kaloko Dam on Kauai. C. Brewer and Co., Ltd.

  The federal district court disagreed with the insurer's strident claim that Wisconsin followed the manifestation trigger for deciding coverage under a homeowner's policy. Strauss v. Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 2, 2013).

   Several years after their house was constructed, the insureds discovered water damage. Chubb denied

   The insurer promoted a variety of arguments for summary judgment to deny coverage for water damage under a homeowner's policy. Strauss v. Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 2, 2013). 

   Construction of the insureds' home was completed in 1994. In October 2010, they discovered water damage