While the Arizona Appellate Court found limited coverage for a computer fraud attack against the insured, it also determined there were multiple occurrences. AIMS Ins. Program Managers, Inc. v. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co., 2921 Ariz. App. Unpub. LEXIS 123 (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 4, 2021).

    Thieves secretly accessed from an

    The court found there was no coverage for the property management company after a fraudster sent a false email with wiring instructions, causing a loss of $200,000. Ernst & Haas Mgmt. Co. v. Hiscox, Inc., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218379 (C.D. Calif. Nov. 5, 2020). 

    Ernst & Haas (E&H) employee

    Two endorsements precluded coverage for cyber theft experienced by the insured. Midlothian Enterprises, Inc. v. Owners Insurance Company, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30237 (E.D. Va. Feb. 20, 2020). 

    JoAnne Davis received an email from the Midlothian president and shareholder, E. Bryce Powell, asking her to wire money to a specified bank

    The court found direct physical loss was established, allowing coverage for a ransomware attack on the insured's computer server and networked computers. Nat'l Ink & Stitch, LLC v. State Auto Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11411 (D. Md. Jan. 23, 2020).

    The insured stored art, logos

    The federal district court granted in part, denied in part, the insurer's motion to dismiss a claim for computer fraud submitted under the insurer's crime protection policy. Childrens Place, Inc. v. Great Am. Ins. Co., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70109 (D. N. J. April 25, 2019).

    On July 24, 2017