The policy's false pretense exclusion relied upon the insurer to deny coverage for an act of cyber fraud was found ambiguous. Rainforest Chocolate v. Sentinel Ins. Co., 2018 VT LEXIS 140 (Vt. Dec. 28, 2018).

    Rainforest Chocolate, LLC was insured under a business-owner policy issued by Sentinel. In May 2016

    The Sixth Circuit, overturning the district court's award of summary judgment to the insurer, reversed and remanded denial of the claim for computer fraud. Am. Tooling Center, Inc. v. Travelers Cas. and Sur. Co of Am., 895 F.3d 455 (6th Cir. 2018).

    American Tooling Center (ATC) produced stamping dies for

      The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the denial of coverage under a Computer Fraud policy. Interactive Communications International, Inc. v. Great American Ins. Co., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 12410 (11th Cir. May 10, 2018). 

       Great American issued a Computer Fraud policy to Interactive Communications International, Inc. (InComm). InComm sells "chits" to consumers, who

    The insured's Computer Fraud policy failed to provide coverage for a fraudulent email scheme based upon an exclusion barring coverage where an authorized person entered the insured's computer system. Aqua Star Untied States Corp. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am., 2018 US. App. LEXIS 9660 (9th Cir. April 17, 2018). 

    The federal district court determined there was coverage for losses sustained by the insured due to a cyber attack. Medidata Solutions, Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122210 (S.D. N.Y. July 21, 2017). 

    Medidata provided cloud-based services to scientists conducting research in clinical trials. Medidata email addresses