After being sued in a personal injury action, Marc-Scot Realty (property owner) and Willie Construction, sought a defense as additional insureds under Arch Builder's (general contractor) liability policy.  See Marc-Scot Realty Corp v. Praetorian Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29380 (E.D. N.Y. March 26, 2010). 

    The court agreed Willie Construction was an

   In Kaufmann v. The Travelers Companies, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20027 (D. Md. March 5, 2010), the insureds sold their restaurant to plaintiffs.  The insureds represented that the restaurant and bar seated 400 patrons.  The plaintiffs made known to the insureds they intended to create a patio that would utilize the 400

   The additional insured contractor was not entitled to a defense where the underlying case failed to allege any negligence by insured subcontractor.  See Clarendon Nat. Ins. Co. v. Am. States Ins. Co., No. 09-548-JO, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16091 (D. Ore. Feb. 22, 2010).

   Providence built houses and subcontracted with Woodmaster to

   The "your work" exclusion was held inapplicable to damaged portions of a building for which the insured was not responsible.  Fortney & Weygandt, Inc. v. Am. Manufacturers Mutual Ins. Co., No 05-4031, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2836 (6th Cir. Feb. 12, 2010).

    The insured contracted with Frisch's Restaurants, Inc. to build a Golden Corral

   Does a policy's Blanket Additional Insured Endorsement bar primary coverage for an additional insured with a policy of its own?  Although the court answered yes in Kummer Enter., Inc. v. HBE Corp., No. 1:09-cv-109, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6403 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 27, 2010), it nevertheless determined the additional insured was entitled to a

   This cases touches on both maritime law and insurance coverage.  Therefore, the initial question was which office blog should do the post: our blog or hawaiioceanlaw.com, authored by  Damon Key blogging colleague, Mark Murakami?  Easily resolved: Mark found the case, but passed it on to us.

   In Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Sneed's Shipbuilding, Inc.

   The applicability of a policy's land subsidence exclusion was considered by the court in City of Carlsbad v. Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania, No. D053843, 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 2025 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 17, 2009).

   The insured City of Carlsbad negligently maintained and repaired a fire hydrant and water line