A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeal agreed that the insured had entered an enforceable settlement with his insurer regarding a coverage dispute. Flowers v. United Services Automobile Assoc., No. 30085, Summary Disposition Order (Haw. Ct. App. May 17, 2013). [Order here].
The insured made a claim under his renter's insurance…
The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's finding of liability on the part of the insurer and the agent for their failure to properly procure flood insurance for the insureds. Barnett v. Fid. Nat'l Prop. & Cas. Co., 2013 La. App. LEXIS 856 (La. Ct. App. May 1, 2013).
The…
In an unpublished opinion, the California Court of Appeal determined there was no coverage for damage caused by a leaking pipe, including mold. Brown v. Mid-Century Ins. Co., 2013 Cal App. Unpub. LEXIS 2389 (Cal. Ct. App. April 2, 2013).
In February 2009, the insureds noticed condensation on the windows of their…
Judge Kay of the Hawaii federal district court found coverage under an all-risk policy for damage caused by arsenic. Ass'n of Apt. Owners of Imperial Plaza v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50904 (D. Haw. April 9, 2013).
Plaintiff had a fourth floor constructed on top of its existing…
The federal district court disagreed with the insurer's strident claim that Wisconsin followed the manifestation trigger for deciding coverage under a homeowner's policy. Strauss v. Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 2, 2013).
Several years after their house was constructed, the insureds discovered water damage. Chubb denied…
The Washington Supreme Court reversed a summary judgment ruling for the insurer based upon the insured's failure to cooperate due to genuine factual issues. Staples v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2013 Wash. LEXIS 69 (Wash. Jan. 24, 2013).
The insured's van was stolen. Inside the van was a large collection of work tools.
The insured's inability to present evidence of an agent's standard of professional care meant it could not succeed on a claim for failure to procure adequate coverage for damage to vacant property. Rayfield Pro., LLC v. Business Insurers of the Carolinas, Inc., 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 1429 (N.C. Ct. App. Dec. 18, 2012).…
Although the insurer failed to understand the pertinent law that mandated coverage under the policy, its actions did not rise to an unfair claim settlement practice justifying multiple damages. Gelwan v. Vermont Mut. Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. app. LEXIS 210 (2nd Cir. Jan. 4, 2013).
In 1999, a contractor re-roofed the insureds'…
The insurer promoted a variety of arguments for summary judgment to deny coverage for water damage under a homeowner's policy. Strauss v. Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 2, 2013).
Construction of the insureds' home was completed in 1994. In October 2010, they discovered water damage…
The insured sought relief from the ensuing loss provision when the wear and tear exclusion barred coverage. Rapid Park Indus. v. Great N. Ins. Co., 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 23107 (2nd Cir. Nov. 9, 2012).
The insureds leased and operated a parking garage on the lower levels of a building in Manhattan. The…
