Failing to understand the relationship between himself, his mortgage company, and his insurer, the plaintiff was left without coverage for damage caused by Hurricane Katrina.  Dace v. Novastar Mortgage Inc., 2011 La. App. Unpub. LEXIS 233 (La. Ct. App. April 13, 2011).

   Novastar held the mortgage on the plaintiff's property in New Orleans.  There were

   Lost business opportunities after Hurricane Katrina hit was the issue before the court in Safeguard Storage, Properties, L.L.C. v. Donahue Favret Contractors, Inc., 2011 La. App. LEXIS 391 (La. Ct. App. March 31, 2011).

   Safeguard planned to develop a minimum of twelve to fifteen new self-storage locations each year for several years.  Market

   The court denied cross motions for summary judgment, deciding there were genuine issues of material fact regarding the applicability of both the exclusion for vandalism and the ensuing loss provision.  See New London County Ins. Co. v. Zachem, 2011 Conn. Super. LEXIS 381 (Conn. Super. Ct. Feb. 18, 2011).

   Vandals broke into the

   Our firm has had many questions on insurance related issues since Friday's Earthquake and Tsunami in Japan.  The following outline is quick primer on insurance coverage related to natural catastrophes.

INSURING PROPERTY FOR CATASTROPHES

●          Cost of Natural Disasters:

∙   Hurricane Katrina in 2005 cost insurers and reinsurers $62.2 billion.    

∙   Hurricane Ike in 2008 cost the insurance

   The ABA’s Section of Litigation, Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee’s annual conference was held in Tucson on March 3-5, 2011.  My colleagues, Rina Carmel, Esq., of Carlson, Calladine & Peterson LLP, and Lisa M. Shusto, P.E., of Exponent Failure Analysis Associates, and I led two lively and engaging discussions on ensuing loss provisions in property

   In October, we reported here that the Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed the cancellation of a policy based on the insured's misrepresentation of the type of vehicle being insured.  The Hawaii Supreme Court recently affirmed the ICA's decision.  See Farmer v. Pacific Speciality Ins. Co., 2011 Haw. LEXIS 28 (Haw. Feb. 7, 2011).

   Farmer

   The Fifth Circuit considered whether the second-layer excess policy incorporated the anti-concurrent causation clause and water exclusion from the primary policy.  See ARM Properties Management Group v. RSUI Indemn. Co., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23174 (5th Cir. Nov. 5, 2010).

   ARM purchased property insurance for hundreds of apartment complexes.  By grouping separate