A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
The collapse of shoring equipment raised the issue of whether loss of the concrete slab it supported was covered as a resulting loss. The court answered no in Vision One, LLC v. Philadelphia Indemn. Ins. Co., 2010 Wash. App. LEXIS 2322 (Wash. Ct. App. Oct. 19, 2010).
A structural engineer examined the…
Preparing for a presentation at the March 2011 ABA, Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee's seminar, my Lexis search function is set to find cases on ensuing loss. One such find was TMW Enter., Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., 619 F.3d 574 (6th Cir. 2010).
TMW purchased a recently constructed condominium and retail building. TMW…
Whether damage caused by rainwater escaping from a drainage system was excluded as "surface water" or flood was the issue before the court in M and M Corp v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 2010 S.C. LEXIS 326 (S.C. Oct. 11, 2010).
The insured owned a hotel located along a street that was being improved by…
A prior post [here] discussed the Fifth Circuit's grappling with the proper measurement for covering loss of a home due to Hurricane Katrina. On rehearing, the Fifth Circuit altered its prior determination that the policy's loss provision was ambiguous. See Bradley v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19476 (5th Cir. Sept.
The American Samoa Power Authority (ASPA) recently filed suit against Lloyd’s and HCC International Insurance Company for failure to provide coverage for property loss caused by the earthquakes and tsunamis that struck the area in September 2009. See Am. Samoa Power Authority v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, et al., Civil No. 10-00546 ACK-KSC…
The insurer's cancellation of a policy based upon a misrepresentation of the vehicle being covered was deemed justified by the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeal in Farmer v. Pacific Specialty Ins. Co., 2010 Haw. App. LEXIS 525 (Haw. Ct. App., Sept. 30, 2010).
The insured purchased a policy for a used motorcycle…
After flood coverage was denied, the insured sued under state law theories. See Worthen v. Galveston Ins. Associates, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94925 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 13, 2010). The district court dismissed the state law claims on preemption grounds.
The insured purchased a flood policy on August 10, 2007 for his home…
Can an insured settle a disputed claim with its first party insurer and then sue the insurer for allegedly fraudulently inducing a settlement of the claim for less than it is worth? The California Supreme Court answered no in Village Northridge Homeowners Assoc. v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 2010 Cal. LEXIS…
The insured had a commercial property policy with Lexington. Coverage included $25 million in losses for business interruption. See Consolidated Co. Inc. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17146 (5th Cir. Aug. 17, 2010).
Hurricane Katrina damaged the insured's property and equipment. The insured was able, however, to resume partial operations ten days…
When both a covered risk and a non-covered risk cause some of the property damage, which party bears the burden of identifying the discrete items of property that were damaged and proving what portion of the damage was caused by a non-covered or excluded risk? See Bayle v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2010 U.S.
