A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
The insureds' home was damaged by a flood in Ross, California, on December 31, 2005. See Cook v. USAA General Indemn. Co., No. C-07-4042, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45490 (N.D. Cal. June 1, 2009). The home was insured under a National Flood Insurance Program policy issued by USAA.
The home was located in a flood…
Here is a report in today's Insurance Journal regarding oral argument conducted last Tuesday before the Mississippi Supreme Court in Corban v. United Services Automobile Assoc., No. 2008-M-645 (Miss.) At issue is the application of the anti-concurrent causation clause where the insured's home was allegedly damaged by both wind and flood. We have previously discussed the Corban…
The insured's property was damaged during Hurricane Katrina by wind, wind driven rain, flooding, storm surge and water in Jupiter v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, No. 07-1689, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44083 May 26, 2009). Plaintiff recovered $225,500 from Allstate, its flood insurance carrier. The insured also held a homeowner's policy with Automobile Club…
Senior Judge Senter from the Southern District of Mississippi continues to be on the front lines of the Katrina insurance coverage battles. In a case headed for trial, Judge Senter recently denied motions by both the insured and insurer attempting to establish estoppel on coverage issues. See Politz v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.…
Coverage under a homeowners' policy was denied by State Farm when corrosion surrounding a nail driven through a pipe caused a leak and extensive water damage many years later. See Freedman v. State Farm Ins. Co., B202617 (Cal. Ct. App. May 5, 2009)[here]. The policy provided "all-risk" coverage, but excluded loss from:…
A mixed result for the insured and excess insurers was reached in Six Flags Inc. v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., No. 08-30476, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8273 (5th Cir. April 21, 2009)[here]. Although the Fifth Circuit determined most insurers had no further coverage obligation, the flood exclusion in one excess policy…
It's now late April. Posting on a decision rendered in March, early March at that, breaches a blogger's protocol. And In Re: Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Litigation; Pertains to: Road Home, Louisiana State, No. 05-4182, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30406 (E.D. La. March 5, 2009), received press when issued. The case allowed individual claims…
The Hawai`i Intermediate Court of Appeals' (ICA) decision in Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sentinel Ins. Co., Ltd., No. 27429, 2009 Haw. App. LEXIS 134 (Haw. Ct. App. March 31, 2009) is unpublished and the facts are detailed, but it's a Hawaii insurance-related decision. So we submit the following.
Ms. Labrador, the insured, sustained…
It's an unpublished decision and not certified for publication. Nevertheless, the analysis of the interplay between the anti-concurrent causation clause and the efficient proximate cause doctrine described in Rouland v. Pacific Specialty Ins. Co., G040299, 2009 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2589 (Cal. Ct. App. March 30, 2009) warrants attention.
The insured's home suffered damage…
How does the court assign the burden of proof when a property policy does not clearly state whether it is an all risks or named perils policy? The court faced such a policy in Royale Green Condominium Assoc., Inc. v. Aspen Specialty Ins. Co., No. 07-21404, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24349 (S.D. Fla. March 24, 2009).
After Hurricane Wilma…
