The court found that when considered as a whole, separately filed proofs of loss  and estimates of damage were sufficient to meet the requirements of a flood policy. Young v. Imperial Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51863 (April 15, 2014).

   On August 29, 2012, plaintiffs' property sustained flood

   The insurer's attempt to dismiss the insured's multi-count complaint for failure to provide full coverage for flood damage failed. Ragusa Corp. v. Standard Fire Ins. Co., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40812 (D. Conn. March 27, 2014).

   The insureds' house suffered significant damage due to flood associated with Hurricane Irene. The insureds submitted

   Claims that an insurance broker misrepresented coverage survived a motion to dismiss in a case decided by the New Jersey federal district court. Danho v. Fidelity Nat. Indemn. Ins. Co., Civil Action No. 2:13-CV-04547 (D. N.J. Sept. 25, 2013). 

   The insured's home was covered under a flood policy issued by and through

   An insurance agent was not liable for failing to advise the insureds of a cheaper flood policy for their two properties. Green v. Guidry, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162581 (E.D. La. Nov. 14, 2012).

   The insureds owned two residences purchased in 1991 and 2006. They purchased flood insurance through an Allstate agent

   The federal district court considered the applicability of a document retention clause in Amtex Bancshares v. Bancinsure, Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140557 (E.D. Tex Sept. 11, 2012).

   Hurricane Ike caused severe damage to the insured's bank on September 13, 2008. The policy issued by Bancinsure, Inc. covered the property and its contents.